Clinical significance of central corneal thickness in the management of glaucoma

Carolyn Y. Shih, Joshua S.Graff Zivin, Stephen L. Trokel, James C. Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

120 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of central corneal thickness determination on the clinical management of patients with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect. Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study was performed on 188 consecutive patients. Mean ultrasound pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness and corresponding Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements were obtained. Intraocular pressures (IOPs) were corrected using linear and mathematical (Orssengo-Pye) algorithms. Measurement-significant outcomes were defined as an IOP adjustment of 1.5 mm Hg or greater and outcomes-significant results as an IOP adjustment of 3.0 mm Hg or greater. Changes in therapy such as the use of eyedrops and addition or cancellation of laser therapy or surgery were then noted for those individuals with measurement- or outcomes-significant changes. Results: Using the linear correction scale, 105 (55.9%) of 188 patients had at least a measurement-significant adjustment in their IOP measurements: 67 (35.6%) had adjustments between 1.5 and 3.0 mm Hg, while 38 (20.2%) had an outcomes-significant IOP adjustment (≥3.0 mm Hg). Among the 188 patients, 16 (8.5%) had a change in eyedrop therapy, 4 (2.1%) had a change regarding laser therapy, and 6 (3.2%) had a change in the decision regarding glaucoma surgery. Using the exponential correction (Orssengo-Pye) scale, similar percentages were obtained. Conclusions: Pachymetry-measured central corneal thickness has a significant effect on the clinical management of patients with glaucoma and glaucoma suspect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1270-1275
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Ophthalmology
Volume122
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical significance of central corneal thickness in the management of glaucoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this