Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina

  • F. M. Fesmire
  • , M. Campbell
  • , W. W. Decker
  • , J. M. Howell
  • , J. A. Kline
  • , S. V. Cantrill
  • , S. A. Colucciello
  • , W. C. Dalsey
  • , W. W. Decker
  • , F. M. Fesmire
  • , J. M. Howell
  • , A. S. Jagoda
  • , Jr Karas S.
  • , E. K. Kuffner
  • , T. W. Lukens
  • , P. J. Mariani
  • , D. L. Morgan
  • , B. A. Murphy
  • , M. P. Pietrzak
  • , S. M. Silvers
  • S. Wall, R. L. Wears, G. W. Molzen, R. Whitson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

72 Scopus citations

Abstract

This clinical policy focuses on critical issues in the evaluation and management of patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. A MEDLINE search for articles published between January 1993 and December 1998 was performed using combinations of the key words chest pain, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, thrombolytics, primary angioplasty, 12-lead ECG, ST-segment monitoring, cardiac serum markers, and chest pain centers. Subcommittee members and expert peer reviewers also supplied articles with direct bearing on the policy. This policy focuses on 5 areas of current interest and/or controversy: (1) ECG eligibility criteria for fibrinolytic therapy, (2) role of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction, (3) use of serum markers to diagnose acute myocardial infarction, (4) serial 12-lead ECGs during the initial evaluation, and (5) chest pain evaluation units. Recommendations for patient management are provided for each of these 5 topics based on strength of evidence (Standards, Guidelines, Options). Standards represent patient management principles that reflect a high degree of clinical certainty; Guidelines represent patient management principles that reflect moderate clinical certainty; and Options represent other patient management strategies based on preliminary, inconclusive, or conflicting evidence, or based on panel consensus. This guideline is intended for physicians working in hospital-based emergency departments or chest pain evaluation units.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)521-544
Number of pages24
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this