TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Nutrition Research and the COVID-19 Pandemic
T2 - A Scoping Review of the ASPEN COVID-19 Task Force on Nutrition Research
AU - ASPEN COVID-19 Task Force on Nutrition Research
AU - Mechanick, Jeffrey I.
AU - Carbone, Salvatore
AU - Dickerson, Roland N.
AU - Hernandez, Beverly J.D.
AU - Hurt, Ryan T.
AU - Irving, Sharon Y.
AU - Li, Ding You
AU - McCarthy, Mary S.
AU - Mogensen, Kris M.
AU - Gautier, Juan B.Ochoa
AU - Patel, Jayshil J.
AU - Prewitt, T. Elaine
AU - Rosenthal, Martin
AU - Warren, Malissa
AU - Winkler, Marion F.
AU - McKeever, Liam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - The purpose of this scoping review by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Nutrition Task Force was to examine nutrition research applicable to the COVID-19 pandemic. The rapid pace of emerging scientific information has prompted this activity to discover research/knowledge gaps. This methodology adhered with recommendations from the Joanna Briggs Institute. There were 2301 citations imported. Of these, there were 439 articles fully abstracted, with 23 main topic areas identified across 24 article types and sourced across 61 countries and 51 specialties in 8 settings and among 14 populations. Epidemiological/mechanistic relationships between nutrition and COVID-19 were reviewed and results mapped to the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Time (PICO-T) questions. The aggregated data were analyzed by clinical stage: pre–COVID-19, acute COVID-19, and chronic/post–COVID-19. Research gaps were discovered for all PICO-T questions. Nutrition topics meriting urgent research included food insecurity/societal infrastructure and transcultural factors (pre–COVID-19); cardiometabolic-based chronic disease, pediatrics, nutrition support, and hospital infrastructure (acute COVID-19); registered dietitian nutritionist counseling (chronic/post–COVID-19); and malnutrition and management (all stages). The paucity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was particularly glaring. Knowledge gaps were discovered for PICO-T questions on pediatrics, micronutrients, bariatric surgery, and transcultural factors (pre–COVID-19); enteral nutrition, protein-energy requirements, and glycemic control with nutrition (acute COVID-19); and home enteral and parenteral nutrition support (chronic/post–COVID-19). In conclusion, multiple critical areas for urgent nutrition research were identified, particularly using RCT design, to improve nutrition care for patients before, during, and after COVID-19.
AB - The purpose of this scoping review by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Nutrition Task Force was to examine nutrition research applicable to the COVID-19 pandemic. The rapid pace of emerging scientific information has prompted this activity to discover research/knowledge gaps. This methodology adhered with recommendations from the Joanna Briggs Institute. There were 2301 citations imported. Of these, there were 439 articles fully abstracted, with 23 main topic areas identified across 24 article types and sourced across 61 countries and 51 specialties in 8 settings and among 14 populations. Epidemiological/mechanistic relationships between nutrition and COVID-19 were reviewed and results mapped to the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Time (PICO-T) questions. The aggregated data were analyzed by clinical stage: pre–COVID-19, acute COVID-19, and chronic/post–COVID-19. Research gaps were discovered for all PICO-T questions. Nutrition topics meriting urgent research included food insecurity/societal infrastructure and transcultural factors (pre–COVID-19); cardiometabolic-based chronic disease, pediatrics, nutrition support, and hospital infrastructure (acute COVID-19); registered dietitian nutritionist counseling (chronic/post–COVID-19); and malnutrition and management (all stages). The paucity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was particularly glaring. Knowledge gaps were discovered for PICO-T questions on pediatrics, micronutrients, bariatric surgery, and transcultural factors (pre–COVID-19); enteral nutrition, protein-energy requirements, and glycemic control with nutrition (acute COVID-19); and home enteral and parenteral nutrition support (chronic/post–COVID-19). In conclusion, multiple critical areas for urgent nutrition research were identified, particularly using RCT design, to improve nutrition care for patients before, during, and after COVID-19.
KW - cardiometabolic risk
KW - coronavirus disease 2019
KW - diabetes
KW - enteral nutrition
KW - knowledge gap
KW - knowledge translation
KW - metabolic syndrome
KW - nutrition
KW - nutrition research
KW - nutrition support therapy
KW - obesity
KW - parenteral nutrition
KW - research gap
KW - scoping review
KW - severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2
KW - social determinants of health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096683369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jpen.2036
DO - 10.1002/jpen.2036
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33094848
AN - SCOPUS:85096683369
SN - 0148-6071
VL - 45
SP - 13
EP - 31
JO - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
JF - Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
IS - 1
ER -