Abstract
Objective: With the gradual replacement of the ICD-9 coding system by the newer ICD-10 system, there is a need to critically evaluate how the system improves- or fails to improve-the coding of specific cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The following review examines the new system and the key components for practitioners who treat patients with such anomalies. Conclusions: While seemingly beneficial in certain respects, the newer ICD-10 system remains far from ideal for cleft and craniofacial anomalies. With future iterations of the system, a more concerted effort to precisely code such anomalies is warranted, which will likely require input from key practitioners.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e81-e83 |
| Journal | Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2016 |
Keywords
- Classification
- Cleft
- Disease
- International
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cleft and craniofacial coding in ICD-10'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver