Choosing a measure of support need: Implications for research and policy

H. K. Brown, H. Ouellette-Kuntz, I. Bielska, D. Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The paradigm surrounding the delivery of care for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) is shifting from a deficit-based approach to a support-based approach. However, it is unclear whether measures of support act as a proxy for adaptive functioning. Methods: A sample of 40 staff or family members of individuals with ID completed the Supports Intensity Scale and the Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised, Short Form. Correlations were used to examine the relationship between these scales. Results: The subscales of the Supports Intensity Scale as well as the overall support needs index were highly correlated with both the Broad Independence W score and the support score (which reflects both maladaptive and adaptive behaviours) of the Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised. Conclusions: The strong correlations between these two scales confirm previous findings that current measures of support and measures of adaptive behaviour tap into the same underlying construct. These findings have implications for the development, use and interpretation of research and planning tools.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)949-954
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disability Research
Volume53
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adaptive behaviour
  • Intellectual disability
  • Maladaptive behaviour
  • Policy
  • Research
  • Support

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing a measure of support need: Implications for research and policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this