Abstract
To the Editor: The review by Scharschmidt et al. of approaches to the patient with cholestatic jaundice (June 23 issue)1 is inaccurate in its dismissal of cholescintigraphy as a routine procedure in the evaluation of these patients. The papers cited to document the shortcomings of radioisotope techniques2 3 4 use data from studies performed before 1981 with technetium-99m-iminodiacetic acid analogues now considered suboptimal for imaging in patients with elevated serum bilirubin. Most institutions now use technetium-99m disofenin as the radiopharmaceutical of choice, since it has been shown to give diagnostic results despite bilirubin levels approaching 40 mg per 100 ml.5,6 In addition,.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1191-1193 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | New England Journal of Medicine |
Volume | 309 |
Issue number | 19 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 10 Nov 1983 |
Externally published | Yes |