TY - JOUR
T1 - Changes in Lifestyle Factors After Endoscopic Screening
T2 - A Prospective Study in the United States
AU - Knudsen, Markus Dines
AU - Wang, Liang
AU - Wang, Kai
AU - Wu, Kana
AU - Ogino, Shuji
AU - Chan, Andrew T.
AU - Giovannucci, Edward
AU - Song, Mingyang
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This work was supported by the U.S. National Intitules of Health (UM1 CA186107, P01 CA87969, U01 CA176726, U01 CA167552, and R00 CA215314 [to Mingyang Song]; K24 DK098311, R01 CA137178, R01 CA202704 [to Andrew T. Chan]; P01 CA55075, R01 CA151993, and R35 CA197735 [to Shuji Ogino]; R03 CA197879 and R21 CA222940 to Kana Wu]; P01 CA55075, R01 CA151993, and R35 CA197735 [to Shuji Ogino]; R21 CA230873 [to Kana Wu and Shuji Ogino]), the American Institute for Cancer Research (to Kana Wu), the American Cancer Society (MRSG-17-220-01-NEC [to Mingyang Song]), and the South-Eastern Norway Reginal Health Authority (project number: 20190770 [to Markus Dines Knudsen]). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 AGA Institute
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Background: Endoscopic screening and adherence to a healthy lifestyle are major avenues for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. We investigated changes in lifestyles after endoscopic screening. Methods: We drew data from 76,303 pairs of time- and age-matched individuals who had and had not, respectively, reported first time endoscopic screening, in the 3 cohorts (Nurses’ Health Study I and II and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study). Detailed information was collected every 2–4 years on endoscopy screening, 12 lifestyle factors (including smoking, physical activity, regular use of aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, body weight, and 8 dietary factors), and adherence to a healthy lifestyle based on a score defined by 5 major lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol, body weight, physical activity, and diet). We assessed changes in lifestyle from pre- to post-screening periods for the matched pairs. We also conducted subgroup analysis according to screening findings (negative, low- and high-risk polyps, and CRC). Results: Endoscopic screening was associated with higher prevalence of adherence to a healthy lifestyle (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.16). The association strengthened with the severity of the screening findings, with an OR of 1.09 (95% CI, 1.03–1.15) for negative screening, 1.19 (95% CI, 1.07–1.33) for low-risk polyps, 1.42 (95% CI, 1.14–1.77) for high-risk polyps, and 1.55 (95% CI, 1.17–2.05) for CRC. The individual lifestyle factors and diet showed modest change. Conclusions: Endoscopic screening was associated with a modest improvement in healthy lifestyles, particularly in individuals with more severe endoscopic findings. Further efforts of integrating lifestyle medicine into the screening setting are needed, to better leverage the teachable moment in improving CRC prevention.
AB - Background: Endoscopic screening and adherence to a healthy lifestyle are major avenues for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. We investigated changes in lifestyles after endoscopic screening. Methods: We drew data from 76,303 pairs of time- and age-matched individuals who had and had not, respectively, reported first time endoscopic screening, in the 3 cohorts (Nurses’ Health Study I and II and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study). Detailed information was collected every 2–4 years on endoscopy screening, 12 lifestyle factors (including smoking, physical activity, regular use of aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, body weight, and 8 dietary factors), and adherence to a healthy lifestyle based on a score defined by 5 major lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol, body weight, physical activity, and diet). We assessed changes in lifestyle from pre- to post-screening periods for the matched pairs. We also conducted subgroup analysis according to screening findings (negative, low- and high-risk polyps, and CRC). Results: Endoscopic screening was associated with higher prevalence of adherence to a healthy lifestyle (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.16). The association strengthened with the severity of the screening findings, with an OR of 1.09 (95% CI, 1.03–1.15) for negative screening, 1.19 (95% CI, 1.07–1.33) for low-risk polyps, 1.42 (95% CI, 1.14–1.77) for high-risk polyps, and 1.55 (95% CI, 1.17–2.05) for CRC. The individual lifestyle factors and diet showed modest change. Conclusions: Endoscopic screening was associated with a modest improvement in healthy lifestyles, particularly in individuals with more severe endoscopic findings. Further efforts of integrating lifestyle medicine into the screening setting are needed, to better leverage the teachable moment in improving CRC prevention.
KW - Colorectal Cancer Screening
KW - Diet
KW - Lifestyle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113314052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.014
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 34256146
AN - SCOPUS:85113314052
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 20
SP - e1240-e1249
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 6
ER -