TY - JOUR
T1 - Cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
T2 - A randomized, double-blind safety study comparing cetuximab produced from two manufacturing processes using the EXTREME study regimen
AU - Soulières, Denis
AU - Aguilar, Jose Luis
AU - Chen, Eric
AU - Misiukiewicz, Krzysztof
AU - Ernst, Scott
AU - Lee, Hyun Jung
AU - Bryant, Katherine
AU - He, Shuang
AU - Obasaju, Coleman K.
AU - Chang, Shao Chun
AU - Chin, Steve
AU - Adkins, Douglas
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company. US commercial cetuximab is manufactured by ImClone LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company. Medical writing assistance was provided by Justine Southby, PhD, CMPP, and Serina Stretton, PhD, CMPP, of ProScribe – Envision Pharma Group, and was funded by Eli Lilly. ProScribe’s services complied with international guidelines for Good Publication Practice (GPP2). Eli Lilly was involved in the study design, data collection, data analysis, and preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Soulières et al.
PY - 2016/1/14
Y1 - 2016/1/14
N2 - Background: Cetuximab, in combination with platinum chemotherapy plus 5-fluoruracil (5-FU), is approved for the first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cetuximab manufactured by ImClone (US commercial cetuximab) potentially results in higher systemic exposures than cetuximab manufactured by Boehringer Ingelheim (BI-manufactured cetuximab). This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared the safety profiles of the two cetuximab formulations. Methods: Patients with previously untreated locoregionally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN were randomly assigned to receive the same dose of US commercial cetuximab (Arm A) or BI-manufactured cetuximab (Arm B), each in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin plus 5-FU. The primary outcome was all-grade, all-cause treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: The majority of patients experienced ≥1 TEAE, regardless of causality (Arm A: 75/77 patients, 97.4 %; Arm B: 68/71 patients, 95.8 %). TEAEs with the highest incidence included nausea, fatigue, and hypomagnesemia in both arms. The absolute risk difference between the two arms for patients experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) was 0.029 (p = 0.281, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -0.024, 0.082) for AEs regardless of causality and 0.005 (p = 0.915, 95 % CI: -0.092, 0.103) for AEs possibly related to study drug. There were no significant differences between the two arms in the incidence of acneiform rash, cardiac events, infusion reactions, or hypomagnesemia. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rates were similar in the two arms. Conclusions: There were no clinically meaningful differences in safety between US commercial cetuximab and BI-manufactured cetuximab in combination with platinum-based therapy with 5-FU in patients with locoregionally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN. The use of US commercial cetuximab in this combination chemotherapy regimen did not result in any unexpected safety signals. The efficacy results of this study are consistent with the efficacy results of the cetuximab arm of the EXTREME study. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01081041 ; date of registration: March 3, 2010).
AB - Background: Cetuximab, in combination with platinum chemotherapy plus 5-fluoruracil (5-FU), is approved for the first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cetuximab manufactured by ImClone (US commercial cetuximab) potentially results in higher systemic exposures than cetuximab manufactured by Boehringer Ingelheim (BI-manufactured cetuximab). This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared the safety profiles of the two cetuximab formulations. Methods: Patients with previously untreated locoregionally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN were randomly assigned to receive the same dose of US commercial cetuximab (Arm A) or BI-manufactured cetuximab (Arm B), each in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin plus 5-FU. The primary outcome was all-grade, all-cause treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: The majority of patients experienced ≥1 TEAE, regardless of causality (Arm A: 75/77 patients, 97.4 %; Arm B: 68/71 patients, 95.8 %). TEAEs with the highest incidence included nausea, fatigue, and hypomagnesemia in both arms. The absolute risk difference between the two arms for patients experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) was 0.029 (p = 0.281, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -0.024, 0.082) for AEs regardless of causality and 0.005 (p = 0.915, 95 % CI: -0.092, 0.103) for AEs possibly related to study drug. There were no significant differences between the two arms in the incidence of acneiform rash, cardiac events, infusion reactions, or hypomagnesemia. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rates were similar in the two arms. Conclusions: There were no clinically meaningful differences in safety between US commercial cetuximab and BI-manufactured cetuximab in combination with platinum-based therapy with 5-FU in patients with locoregionally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN. The use of US commercial cetuximab in this combination chemotherapy regimen did not result in any unexpected safety signals. The efficacy results of this study are consistent with the efficacy results of the cetuximab arm of the EXTREME study. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01081041 ; date of registration: March 3, 2010).
KW - Carcinoma, squamous cell
KW - Cetuximab
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Safety
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954237648&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12885-016-2064-0
DO - 10.1186/s12885-016-2064-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 26768732
AN - SCOPUS:84954237648
SN - 1471-2407
VL - 16
JO - BMC Cancer
JF - BMC Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - 19
ER -