TY - JOUR
T1 - Cervical Laminoplasty
T2 - Indications, Surgical Considerations, and Clinical Outcomes
AU - Cho, Samuel K.
AU - Kim, Jun S.
AU - Overley, Samuel C.
AU - Merrill, Robert K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Cervical laminoplasty was initially described for the management of cervical myelopathy resulting from multilevel stenosis secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The general concepts are preservation of the dorsal elements, preservation of segmental motion, and expansion of the spinal canal via laminar manipulation. No clear evidence suggests that laminoplasty is superior to either posterior laminectomy or anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. However, laminoplasty has its own advantages, indications, and complications. Surgeons have refined the technique to decrease complication rates and improve efficacy. Recent efforts have highlighted less invasive approaches that are muscle sparing and associated with less postoperative morbidity. Although the long-term outcomes suggest that cervical laminoplasty is safe and effective, continued research on the development of novel modifications that decreasecommoncomplications, such asC5nerve palsy, axial neck pain, and loss of lordosis, is required.
AB - Cervical laminoplasty was initially described for the management of cervical myelopathy resulting from multilevel stenosis secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The general concepts are preservation of the dorsal elements, preservation of segmental motion, and expansion of the spinal canal via laminar manipulation. No clear evidence suggests that laminoplasty is superior to either posterior laminectomy or anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. However, laminoplasty has its own advantages, indications, and complications. Surgeons have refined the technique to decrease complication rates and improve efficacy. Recent efforts have highlighted less invasive approaches that are muscle sparing and associated with less postoperative morbidity. Although the long-term outcomes suggest that cervical laminoplasty is safe and effective, continued research on the development of novel modifications that decreasecommoncomplications, such asC5nerve palsy, axial neck pain, and loss of lordosis, is required.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053713612&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00242
DO - 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00242
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29521698
AN - SCOPUS:85053713612
SN - 1067-151X
VL - 26
SP - e142-e142
JO - The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
JF - The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
IS - 7
ER -