TY - JOUR
T1 - Cervical Esophageal Cancers
T2 - Challenges and Opportunities
AU - Buckstein, Michael
AU - Liu, Jerry
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Purpose of the Review: Cervical esophageal cancers (CECs) are a rare subset of esophageal cancers that are distinct in their management and outcomes. This review explores current data on the optimal management of this disease. Recent Findings: While outcomes for CEC have been suboptimal, several strategies have been proven beneficial in recent years. These include selective surgical resection or salvage surgery, chemoradiation (CRT) vs. radiation (RT) alone, dose escalation, IMRT, and induction chemotherapy. Summary: The optimal management of CEC to achieve the best oncological outcomes and minimize morbidity appears to be definitive chemoradiation with surgery reserved for selective salvage. While the benefit of dose escalated vs. standard dosing for radiation is unclear, most appear to use doses in excess of 50.4 Gy, even in the United States. IMRT might provide a benefit independent of allowing for dose escalation. Induction chemotherapy might allow for “chemoselection”, but the benefit is unclear.
AB - Purpose of the Review: Cervical esophageal cancers (CECs) are a rare subset of esophageal cancers that are distinct in their management and outcomes. This review explores current data on the optimal management of this disease. Recent Findings: While outcomes for CEC have been suboptimal, several strategies have been proven beneficial in recent years. These include selective surgical resection or salvage surgery, chemoradiation (CRT) vs. radiation (RT) alone, dose escalation, IMRT, and induction chemotherapy. Summary: The optimal management of CEC to achieve the best oncological outcomes and minimize morbidity appears to be definitive chemoradiation with surgery reserved for selective salvage. While the benefit of dose escalated vs. standard dosing for radiation is unclear, most appear to use doses in excess of 50.4 Gy, even in the United States. IMRT might provide a benefit independent of allowing for dose escalation. Induction chemotherapy might allow for “chemoselection”, but the benefit is unclear.
KW - Cervical esophagus cancer
KW - Chemoradiation
KW - IMRT
KW - Proximal esophagus
KW - Radiation dose escalation
KW - Squamous cell carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064049512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11912-019-0801-7
DO - 10.1007/s11912-019-0801-7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30949854
AN - SCOPUS:85064049512
VL - 21
JO - Current Oncology Reports
JF - Current Oncology Reports
SN - 1523-3790
IS - 5
M1 - 46
ER -