TY - JOUR
T1 - Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients
T2 - Systematic review and a meta-analysis
AU - Kawamura, Iwanari
AU - Aikawa, Tadao
AU - Yokoyama, Yujiro
AU - Takagi, Hisato
AU - Kuno, Toshiki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Aims: Catheter ablation (CA) is established therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, there is a limited understanding of CA in elderly patients. We studied the long-term efficacy and periprocedural safety of radiofrequency and cryoballoon CA for elderly patients with AF. Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched through April 2021 to investigate the comparative outcomes between elderly and non-elderly patients who underwent CA for AF. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were AF recurrence and procedure-related complications, respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed by procedure type of CA. Results: The search identified 20 observational studies with 110,606 patients, including 8009 elderly patients (7.2%). The risk of AF recurrence was not significantly different between elderly and non-elderly patients (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94–2.00; p =.10, I2= 70%). However, relative to the non-elderly, elderly patients had significantly higher major complications (risk ratio [RR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14–1.54], p <.01, I2= 0%) and overall complications (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.00–1.57; p =.05, I2= 56%) with higher cerebrovascular events (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.25–2.25; p = <.01, I2= 0%). Subgroup analysis with cryoballoon CA showed that procedure-related complications in elderly patients were similar to those in non-elderly patients but not with radiofrequency CA. Conclusions: CA for AF in elderly patients has comparable long-term efficacy compared to that in non-elderly patients; however, the incidence of procedure-related complications were higher in elderly patients. Cryoballoon CA did not confer a higher procedure-related risk in elderly patients.
AB - Aims: Catheter ablation (CA) is established therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF); however, there is a limited understanding of CA in elderly patients. We studied the long-term efficacy and periprocedural safety of radiofrequency and cryoballoon CA for elderly patients with AF. Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched through April 2021 to investigate the comparative outcomes between elderly and non-elderly patients who underwent CA for AF. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were AF recurrence and procedure-related complications, respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed by procedure type of CA. Results: The search identified 20 observational studies with 110,606 patients, including 8009 elderly patients (7.2%). The risk of AF recurrence was not significantly different between elderly and non-elderly patients (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94–2.00; p =.10, I2= 70%). However, relative to the non-elderly, elderly patients had significantly higher major complications (risk ratio [RR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14–1.54], p <.01, I2= 0%) and overall complications (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.00–1.57; p =.05, I2= 56%) with higher cerebrovascular events (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.25–2.25; p = <.01, I2= 0%). Subgroup analysis with cryoballoon CA showed that procedure-related complications in elderly patients were similar to those in non-elderly patients but not with radiofrequency CA. Conclusions: CA for AF in elderly patients has comparable long-term efficacy compared to that in non-elderly patients; however, the incidence of procedure-related complications were higher in elderly patients. Cryoballoon CA did not confer a higher procedure-related risk in elderly patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121364198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/pace.14413
DO - 10.1111/pace.14413
M3 - Article
C2 - 34816458
AN - SCOPUS:85121364198
SN - 0147-8389
VL - 45
SP - 59
EP - 71
JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 1
ER -