Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Catatonia: Disappeared or under-diagnosed?

  • F. M.M.A. Van Der Heijden
  • , S. Tuinier
  • , N. J.M. Arts
  • , M. L.C. Hoogendoorn
  • , R. S. Kahn
  • , W. M.A. Verhoeven

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

175 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Over the last century, especially during the latter half, the prevalence of the diagnosis of catatonic schizophrenia decreased considerably. Several explanations for this phenomenon have been put forward. Sampling and Methods: The present study investigated the frequency of the diagnosis of catatonic schizophrenia in a large sample of admitted psychiatric patients (n = 19,309). In addition, the presence of catatonic symptoms was studied in a sample of patients with schizophrenia (n = 701) and in a group of consecutively admitted psychotic patients (n = 139). In these two groups the effect of the diagnostic procedures on the recognition of catatonia was examined. Results:The diagnosis of catatonic schizophrenia dropped from 7.8% in 1980-1989 to 1.3% in 1990-2001 (p < 0.001). In addition, a possible underdiagnosis of catatonic schizophrenia was found in an independent sample of patients with schizophrenia. Application of a systematic catatonia rating scale in patients admitted with acute psychosis identified a bimodally distributed catatonic dimension. At least 18% of these patients fulfilled the criteria for catatonia. Interestingly, the catatonic subgroup used atypical antipsychotic compounds more frequently (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The results suggest that changes in diagnostic criteria and the diagnostic procedure itself are responsible for the under-recognition of catatonia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-8
Number of pages6
JournalPsychopathology
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Catatonia
  • Schizophrenia
  • Under-diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Catatonia: Disappeared or under-diagnosed?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this