Case and commentary: Peer-reviewed article should needlestick protocols influence documentation or disclosure of a patient's HIV status?

Shaoli Chaudhuri, Raaka Kumbhakar, Ellen Morrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Heightened privacy and confidentiality stakes around HIV have resulted in unique anonymity and nondisclosure policies and practices. This commentary on an occupational exposure case considers benchmarks in the evolution of HIV testing. Persistent stigma continues to exacerbate ethical complexities and ambiguities clinicians face in an "end the epidemic" era.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E376-E381
JournalAMA journal of ethics
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Case and commentary: Peer-reviewed article should needlestick protocols influence documentation or disclosure of a patient's HIV status?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this