TY - JOUR
T1 - Capacity estimates in working memory
T2 - Reliability and interrelationships among tasks
AU - Van Snellenberg, Jared X.
AU - Conway, Andrew R.A.
AU - Spicer, Julie
AU - Read, Christina
AU - Smith, Edward E.
N1 - Funding Information:
E.E.S. (deceased August 17, 2012) was heavily involved throughout the preliminary and intermediate phases of the study reported in this article. He saw early versions of the analyses presented here, but passed away before the maximum likelihood models were fully developed. However, he had seen and approved of earlier analyses that broadly parallel those presented here. This work was supported by NIMH Grant No. 5P50 MH086404. The authors thank Melanie Pincus for her assistance in setting up the study protocol, and Debbie Fraser, Mona Griffin, and Serena di Stefani for their assistance in running participants.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - The concept of capacity has become increasingly important in discussions of working memory (WM), in so far as most models of WM conceptualize it as a limited-capacity mechanism for maintaining information in an active state, and as capacity estimates from at least one type of WM task - complex span - are valid predictors of real-world cognitive performance. However, the term capacity is also often used in the context of a distinct set of WM tasks, change detection, and may or may not refer to the same cognitive capability. We here develop maximum-likelihood models of capacity from each of these tasks - as well as from a third WM task that places heavy demands on cognitive control, the self-ordered WM task (SOT) - and show that the capacity estimates from change detection and complex span tasks are not correlated with each other, although capacity estimates from change detection tasks do correlate with those from the SOT. Furthermore, exploratory factor analysis confirmed that performance on the SOT and change detection load on the same factor, with performance on our complex span task loading on its own factor. These findings suggest that at least two distinct cognitive capabilities underlie the concept of WM capacity as it applies to each of these three tasks.
AB - The concept of capacity has become increasingly important in discussions of working memory (WM), in so far as most models of WM conceptualize it as a limited-capacity mechanism for maintaining information in an active state, and as capacity estimates from at least one type of WM task - complex span - are valid predictors of real-world cognitive performance. However, the term capacity is also often used in the context of a distinct set of WM tasks, change detection, and may or may not refer to the same cognitive capability. We here develop maximum-likelihood models of capacity from each of these tasks - as well as from a third WM task that places heavy demands on cognitive control, the self-ordered WM task (SOT) - and show that the capacity estimates from change detection and complex span tasks are not correlated with each other, although capacity estimates from change detection tasks do correlate with those from the SOT. Furthermore, exploratory factor analysis confirmed that performance on the SOT and change detection load on the same factor, with performance on our complex span task loading on its own factor. These findings suggest that at least two distinct cognitive capabilities underlie the concept of WM capacity as it applies to each of these three tasks.
KW - Cognitive control
KW - Short-term memory
KW - Working memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897485042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13415-013-0235-x
DO - 10.3758/s13415-013-0235-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 24399681
AN - SCOPUS:84897485042
SN - 1530-7026
VL - 14
SP - 106
EP - 116
JO - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
JF - Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience
IS - 1
ER -