CAGI6 ID panel challenge: assessment of phenotype and variant predictions in 415 children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs)

Maria Cristina Aspromonte, Alessio Del Conte, Shaowen Zhu, Wuwei Tan, Yang Shen, Yexian Zhang, Qi Li, Maggie Haitian Wang, Giulia Babbi, Samuele Bovo, Pier Luigi Martelli, Rita Casadio, Azza Althagafi, Sumyyah Toonsi, Maxat Kulmanov, Robert Hoehndorf, Panagiotis Katsonis, Amanda Williams, Olivier Lichtarge, Su XianWesley Surento, Vikas Pejaver, Sean D. Mooney, Uma Sunderam, Rajgopal Srinivasan, Alessandra Murgia, Damiano Piovesan, Silvio C.E. Tosatto, Emanuela Leonardi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Genetics of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Lab in Padua provided a new intellectual disability (ID) Panel challenge for computational methods to predict patient phenotypes and their causal variants in the context of the Critical Assessment of the Genome Interpretation, 6th edition (CAGI6). Eight research teams submitted a total of 30 models to predict phenotypes based on the sequences of 74 genes (VCF format) in 415 pediatric patients affected by Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDDs). NDDs are clinically and genetically heterogeneous conditions, with onset in infant age. Here, we assess the ability and accuracy of computational methods to predict comorbid phenotypes based on clinical features described in each patient and their causal variants. We also evaluated predictions for possible genetic causes in patients without a clear genetic diagnosis. Like the previous ID Panel challenge in CAGI5, seven clinical features (ID, ASD, ataxia, epilepsy, microcephaly, macrocephaly, hypotonia), and variants (Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic, Variants of Uncertain Significance and Risk Factors) were provided. The phenotypic traits and variant data of 150 patients from the CAGI5 ID Panel Challenge were provided as training set for predictors. The CAGI6 challenge confirms CAGI5 results that predicting phenotypes from gene panel data is highly challenging, with AUC values close to random, and no method able to predict relevant variants with both high accuracy and precision. However, a significant improvement is noted for the best method, with recall increasing from 66% to 82%. Several groups also successfully predicted difficult-to-detect variants, emphasizing the importance of variants initially excluded by the Padua NDD Lab.

Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Genetics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CAGI6 ID panel challenge: assessment of phenotype and variant predictions in 415 children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this