Building academic health centers' capacity to shape and respond to comparative effectiveness research policy

Jordan M. VanLare, Patrick H. Conway, John W. Rowe

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

In recent years, the focus on comparative effectiveness research (CER), the funding available to support it, and the range of possible effects of CER policy on academic health centers (AHCs) have increased substantially. CER has implications for the research, education, and clinical care components of AHCs' missions. The current funding and policy environment have created specific opportunities for AHCs to shape and respond to CER policies across the four dimensions of the CER enterprise: research, human and scientific capital, data infrastructure, and translation and dissemination. Characteristics such as the degree of physician-hospital integration, the status of a health information technology infrastructure, and the presence of a well-developed cross-functional health services research capacity linked to the care delivery enterprise could help AHCs respond to these opportunities and influence future policies. AHCs are also essential to the development of methodologies and the training of the next cadre of researchers. Further, a focus on understanding what works in health care and increasing adoption of evidence-based practice must become embedded in the fabric of AHCs. Those AHCs most successful in responding to the CER challenge may leverage it as a point of differentiation in the marketplace for health care and lead transformational improvements in health.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)689-694
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume86
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Building academic health centers' capacity to shape and respond to comparative effectiveness research policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this