Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Low and Non-Low Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing Primary PCI for STEMI

  • Miaohan Qiu
  • , Yixuan Duan
  • , Xiaojian Feng
  • , Kui Chen
  • , Dingbao Zhang
  • , Yuncheng Zou
  • , Xiaohui Zheng
  • , Gang Zhao
  • , Nailiang Tian
  • , Zeqi Zheng
  • , Xiaoping Peng
  • , Qing Yang
  • , Zhenyang Liang
  • , Yi Li
  • , Yaling Han
  • , Gregg W. Stone

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: In the BRIGHT-4 trial, among 6,016 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a radial artery approach, procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin plus a post-PCI high-dose infusion for 2 to 4 hours reduced the 30-day primary composite outcome of all-cause death or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3 to 5 bleeding, as well as death and bleeding individually, compared with heparin monotherapy. Objectives: We sought to determine whether the benefits of bivalirudin apply principally to patients who are at low bleeding risk (LBR) as well as non-LBR. Methods: In a prespecified analysis from BRIGHT-4, outcomes were examined by baseline bleeding risk, with LBR defined as a CRUSADE score <30. Results: At baseline, 4,581 patients (76.1%) were categorized as LBR. Non-LBR patients had higher rates of the 30-day primary endpoint (8.6% vs 2.2%; HR: 4.08 [95% CI: 3.14-5.31]; P < 0.0001), driven by both greater mortality and BARC types 3 to 5 bleeding. In non-LBR patients, the primary outcome occurred in 8.1% of patients randomized to bivalirudin vs 9.2% of those randomized to heparin (difference: −1.1% [95% CI: −4.0% to 1.8%]; HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.62-1.26]). In LBR patients, the primary outcome occurred in 1.4% of patients randomized to bivalirudin vs 2.9% of those randomized to heparin (difference: −1.5% [95% CI: −2.3% to −0.6%]; HR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.32-0.75]) (Pabsolute interaction = 0.81; Prelative interaction = 0.04). The effects of bivalirudin compared with heparin in reducing all-cause death were as robust in LBR patients compared with non-LBR patients (Pabsolute interaction = 0.67; Prelative interaction = 0.06). Conclusions: Among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with radial artery access, procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin plus a high-dose post-PCI infusion for 2 to 4 hours reduced the 30-day risk of all-cause death and major bleeding in patients at low bleeding risk as well as in patients at higher-risk of bleeding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1178-1192
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume88
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Sep 2026

Keywords

  • CRUSADE score
  • bivalirudin
  • bleeding
  • heparin
  • mortality
  • percutaneous coronary intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Low and Non-Low Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing Primary PCI for STEMI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this