TY - JOUR
T1 - Biological drivers of clinical phenotype in myelofibrosis
AU - Mascarenhas, John
AU - Gleitz, Hélène F.E.
AU - Chifotides, Helen T.
AU - Harrison, Claire N.
AU - Verstovsek, Srdan
AU - Vannucchi, Alessandro Maria
AU - Rampal, Raajit K.
AU - Kiladjian, Jean Jacques
AU - Vainchenker, William
AU - Hoffman, Ronald
AU - Schneider, Rebekka K.
AU - List, Alan F.
N1 - Funding Information:
JM receives research funding paid to his institution from Incyte, CTI Bio, Novartis, PharmaEssentia, Merck, Kartos, Geron, BMS, Roche, and consulting fees from Incyte, CTI Bio, Novartis, Roche, BMS, Celgene, Geron, PharmaEssentia, Morphosys, Sierra Oncology, GSK, Galecto, Karyopharm, Kartos, and Imago. HFEG has nothing to declare. HTC has nothing to declare. CNH received research funding paid to the institutional from Novartis, Celgene, and Constellation Pharmaceuticals, MorphoSys and consulting fees from Keros, Galecto, AOP and Roche, Novartis, Celgene, CTI BioPharma, AbbVie, Janssen, Geron, Promedior, AbbVie, AOP Pharma. SV receives research funding paid to the institution from Incyte, Roche, NS Pharma, Celgene, Gilead, Promedior, CTI BioPharma, Blueprint Medicines, Novartis, Sierra Oncology, PharmaEssentia, Protagonist Therapeutics, Kartos Galecto and consulting fees from Constellation, Sierra Oncology, Incyte, Novartis, BMS, Kartos, Galecto, Protagonist. AMV receives consulting fees from Novartis, BMS, Incyte, Blueprint, and Abbvie. RKR receives research funding paid to the institution from Research funding: Constellation, Incyte, Stemline, Zentalis and consulting feels from Constellation, Incyte, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Promedior, CTI, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint, Stemline, Galecto, Pharmaessentia, Abbvie, Sierra Oncology, Disc Medicines, Sunimoto Dainippon, Zentalis. JJK receives consulting fees from Novartis, Abbvie, BMS, Sierra Oncology, CTI Biopharma, PharmaEssentia, AOP Orphan. WV has nothing to disclose. RH received research grant funding to the institution from BMS, Citi Bio, Curis, Inc., Genentech, Kartos Therapeutics, Kymera Therapeutics, OncoMyx Therapeutics, Protagonist Therapeutics, Repare Therapeutics, Scholar Rock, Translational Drug Development (TD2), Turning Point Therapeutics and consulting fees from AbbVie, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Protagonist Therapeutics, Silence Therapeutics. RKS has nothing to declare. AFL receives consulting fees from Halia Therapeutic, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, CTI Biopharma, and Aileron Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative disorder that exhibits considerable biological and clinical heterogeneity. At the two ends of the disease spectrum are the myelodepletive or cytopenic phenotype and the myeloproliferative phenotype. The cytopenic phenotype has a high prevalence in primary MF (PMF) and is characterized by low blood counts. The myeloproliferative phenotype is typically associated with secondary MF (SMF), mild anemia, minimal need for transfusion support, and normal to mild thrombocytopenia. Differences in somatic driver mutations and allelic burden, as well as the acquisition of non-driver mutations further influences these phenotypic differences, prognosis, and response to therapies such as JAK2 inhibitors. The outcome of patients with the cytopenic phenotype are comparatively worse and frequently pose a challenge to treat given the inherent exacerbation of cytopenias. Recent data indicate that an innate immune deregulated state that hinges on the myddosome-IRAK-NFκB axis favors the cytopenic myelofibrosis phenotype and offers opportunity for novel treatment approaches. We will review the biological and clinical features of the MF disease spectrum and associated treatment considerations.
AB - Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative disorder that exhibits considerable biological and clinical heterogeneity. At the two ends of the disease spectrum are the myelodepletive or cytopenic phenotype and the myeloproliferative phenotype. The cytopenic phenotype has a high prevalence in primary MF (PMF) and is characterized by low blood counts. The myeloproliferative phenotype is typically associated with secondary MF (SMF), mild anemia, minimal need for transfusion support, and normal to mild thrombocytopenia. Differences in somatic driver mutations and allelic burden, as well as the acquisition of non-driver mutations further influences these phenotypic differences, prognosis, and response to therapies such as JAK2 inhibitors. The outcome of patients with the cytopenic phenotype are comparatively worse and frequently pose a challenge to treat given the inherent exacerbation of cytopenias. Recent data indicate that an innate immune deregulated state that hinges on the myddosome-IRAK-NFκB axis favors the cytopenic myelofibrosis phenotype and offers opportunity for novel treatment approaches. We will review the biological and clinical features of the MF disease spectrum and associated treatment considerations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142649791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41375-022-01767-y
DO - 10.1038/s41375-022-01767-y
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85142649791
SN - 0887-6924
VL - 37
SP - 255
EP - 264
JO - Leukemia
JF - Leukemia
IS - 2
ER -