Authors' Response to "evidence Does Not Support Exposure to Cosmetic Talc as a Cause of Malignant Mesothelioma"

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	E85-E86
Journal	Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume	62
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001790
State	Published - 1 Feb 2020

Access to Document

@article{3666946bc36c403ba98fa66d184b885d,

title = "Authors' Response to {"}evidence Does Not Support Exposure to Cosmetic Talc as a Cause of Malignant Mesothelioma{"}",

author = "Jacqueline Moline and Kristin Bevilacqua and Gordon, \{Ronald E.\}",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1097/JOM.0000000000001790",

language = "English",

volume = "62",

pages = "E85--E86",

journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",

issn = "1076-2752",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authors' Response to "evidence Does Not Support Exposure to Cosmetic Talc as a Cause of Malignant Mesothelioma"

AU - Moline, Jacqueline

AU - Bevilacqua, Kristin

AU - Gordon, Ronald E.

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85078815740

U2 - 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001790

DO - 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001790

M3 - Letter

C2 - 31815813

AN - SCOPUS:85078815740

SN - 1076-2752

VL - 62

SP - E85-E86

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

IS - 2

ER -