TY - JOUR
T1 - Attention and Memory in Depersonalization-Spectrum Dissociative Disorders
T2 - Impact of Selective-Divided Attentional Condition, Stimulus Emotionality, and Stress
AU - Simeon, Daphne
AU - Knutelska, Margaret
AU - Putnam, Frank W.
AU - Schmeidler, James
AU - Smith, Lisa M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported in part by grant RO1 MH62414 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (Dr. Simeon), and by grant MO1 RR0071 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (Mount Sinai School of Medicine General Clinical Research Center)
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [62414]. This study was supported in part by grant RO1 MH62414 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (Dr. Simeon), and by grant MO1 RR0071 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (Mount Sinai School of Medicine General Clinical Research Center)
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - We investigated cognition in depersonalization-spectrum dissociative disorders without comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder to explore evidence for emotionally avoidant information processing. Forty-eight participants with DSM-IV dissociative disorder (DD) (Depersonalization Disorder–37, Dissociative Disorder NOS −11), 36 participants with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and 56 healthy controls (HC) were administered the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS); the Weschler Memory Scale-III (WMS); and three Stroop tasks: the Standard Stroop, a selective-attention Emotional Stroop using neutral, dissociation, and trauma-related word categories, and a divided-attention Emotional Stroop using comparable words. Participants were also administered a paired-associates explicit and implicit memory test using emotionally neutral and negative words, before and after the Trier Social Stress Test. The DD and HC groups had comparable general intelligence and memory scores, though dissociation severity was inversely related to verbal comprehension and working memory. In the selective-attention condition, DD participants showed greater incidental recall across word categories with comparable interference. However in the divided-attention condition, DD participants significantly favored lesser attentional interference at the expense of remembering words. Across attentional conditions, DD participants had better recall for disorder-related than neutral words. Pre-stress, the DD group demonstrated better explicit memory for neutral versus negative words with reversal after stress, whereas the HC group demonstrated the opposite pattern; implicit memory did not differ. Cognition in the PTSD control group was generally dissimilar to the DD group. The findings in toto provide substantial evidence for emotionally avoidant information processing in DD, vulnerable to the impact of stress, at the level of both attention and memory.
AB - We investigated cognition in depersonalization-spectrum dissociative disorders without comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder to explore evidence for emotionally avoidant information processing. Forty-eight participants with DSM-IV dissociative disorder (DD) (Depersonalization Disorder–37, Dissociative Disorder NOS −11), 36 participants with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and 56 healthy controls (HC) were administered the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS); the Weschler Memory Scale-III (WMS); and three Stroop tasks: the Standard Stroop, a selective-attention Emotional Stroop using neutral, dissociation, and trauma-related word categories, and a divided-attention Emotional Stroop using comparable words. Participants were also administered a paired-associates explicit and implicit memory test using emotionally neutral and negative words, before and after the Trier Social Stress Test. The DD and HC groups had comparable general intelligence and memory scores, though dissociation severity was inversely related to verbal comprehension and working memory. In the selective-attention condition, DD participants showed greater incidental recall across word categories with comparable interference. However in the divided-attention condition, DD participants significantly favored lesser attentional interference at the expense of remembering words. Across attentional conditions, DD participants had better recall for disorder-related than neutral words. Pre-stress, the DD group demonstrated better explicit memory for neutral versus negative words with reversal after stress, whereas the HC group demonstrated the opposite pattern; implicit memory did not differ. Cognition in the PTSD control group was generally dissimilar to the DD group. The findings in toto provide substantial evidence for emotionally avoidant information processing in DD, vulnerable to the impact of stress, at the level of both attention and memory.
KW - Dissociative disorders
KW - PTSD
KW - Stroop
KW - attention
KW - cognition
KW - depersonalization
KW - depersonalization disorder
KW - dissociation
KW - emotional memory
KW - memory
KW - stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131179205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15299732.2022.2079798
DO - 10.1080/15299732.2022.2079798
M3 - Article
C2 - 35616140
AN - SCOPUS:85131179205
SN - 1529-9732
VL - 24
SP - 42
EP - 62
JO - Journal of Trauma and Dissociation
JF - Journal of Trauma and Dissociation
IS - 1
ER -