TY - JOUR
T1 - Association between cognitive function and large optic nerve cupping, accounting for cup-disc-ratio genetic risk score
AU - Kravets, Sasha
AU - Rupnow, Rawan Allozi
AU - Sethi, Abhishek
AU - Espeland, Mark A.
AU - Pasquale, Louis R.
AU - Rapp, Stephen R.
AU - Klein, Barbara E.
AU - Meuer, Stacy M.
AU - Haan, Mary N.
AU - Maki, Pauline M.
AU - Hallak, Joelle A.
AU - Vajaranant, Thasarat Sutabutr
N1 - Funding Information:
Bright Focus Foundation grant M2019155, Maryland (JH): an unrestricted Grant for Research to Prevent Blindness, New York (JH, TSV); P30 Core Grant for Vision Research (2P30EY001792), Maryland. EY015474 National Eye Institute (LRP): Challenge Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York (LRP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2022 Kravets et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Purpose To investigate if accounting for a cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) genetic risk score (GRS) modified the association between large CDR and cognitive function among women. Design This was a retrospective study using data from the Women’s Health Initiative. Methods Patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were excluded. Large CDR was defined as ≥ 0.6 in either eye. Cognitive function was measured by the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE). We used the combined effects from 13 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to formulate the GRS for CDR. We used logistic regression to investigate associations between weighted GRS and large CDR, then a linear regression to assess the association between weighted GRS and 3MSE scores, and between weighted GRS, CDR, and 3MSE scores, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. Results Final analyses included 1,196 White women with mean age of 69.60 ± 3.62 years and 7.27% with large CDR. Mean GRS in women with and without large CDR was 1.51 ± 0.31 vs. 1.41 ± 0.36, respectively (p = 0.004). The odds of large CDR for a one unit increase in GRS was 2.30 (95% CI: (1.22, 4.36), p = 0.011). Adding the CDR GRS in the model with CDR and 3MSE, women with large CDR still had statistically significantly lower 3MSE scores than those without large CDR, yielding a predicted mean difference in 3MSE scores of 0.84 (p = 0.007). Conclusions Independent of the CDR GRS, women with large CDR had a lower cognitive function.
AB - Purpose To investigate if accounting for a cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) genetic risk score (GRS) modified the association between large CDR and cognitive function among women. Design This was a retrospective study using data from the Women’s Health Initiative. Methods Patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were excluded. Large CDR was defined as ≥ 0.6 in either eye. Cognitive function was measured by the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE). We used the combined effects from 13 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to formulate the GRS for CDR. We used logistic regression to investigate associations between weighted GRS and large CDR, then a linear regression to assess the association between weighted GRS and 3MSE scores, and between weighted GRS, CDR, and 3MSE scores, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics. Results Final analyses included 1,196 White women with mean age of 69.60 ± 3.62 years and 7.27% with large CDR. Mean GRS in women with and without large CDR was 1.51 ± 0.31 vs. 1.41 ± 0.36, respectively (p = 0.004). The odds of large CDR for a one unit increase in GRS was 2.30 (95% CI: (1.22, 4.36), p = 0.011). Adding the CDR GRS in the model with CDR and 3MSE, women with large CDR still had statistically significantly lower 3MSE scores than those without large CDR, yielding a predicted mean difference in 3MSE scores of 0.84 (p = 0.007). Conclusions Independent of the CDR GRS, women with large CDR had a lower cognitive function.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140941126&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0258564
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0258564
M3 - Article
C2 - 36315511
AN - SCOPUS:85140941126
VL - 17
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 10 October
M1 - e0258564
ER -