TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of feasibility of workplace health promotion
AU - Partanen, Timo
AU - Johansson, Mauri
AU - Ahrens, Wolfgang
AU - Sala, Maria
AU - Wesseling, Catharina
AU - Boffetta, Paolo
AU - Brenes, Freddy
AU - Font, Carmen
AU - Frentzel-Beyme, Rainer
AU - Garau, Isabel
AU - Janer, Gemma
AU - Kallas-Tarpila, Tarja
AU - Kogevinas, Manolis
AU - Loponen, Minna
AU - Østergren, Laila
AU - Peltomäki, Päivi
AU - Dolores Solér, Maria
AU - Svanström, Leif
AU - Tempel, Jürgen
AU - Neuvonen, Kaisa
N1 - Funding Information:
1This study was supported by the former Europe Against Cancer at the former DG-V, European Community.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Background. A simple empirically based method for assessment of the feasibility of workplace health promotion programs is described, focusing on cancer hazards (lifestyles, workplace hazards, deficient early detection). The basic components of feasibility are addressed: extent of hazards; needs of employees for hazard reduction and acceptability of WHP; and social context. Methods. The procedure consists of six modules: guidelines on feasibility assessment; employee questionnaire; interview checklists for probing attitudes of management and partners (social context); data form; debriefing; and assessment of feasibility. Pretesting was completed in 16 workplace communities representing industry, construction, transport, telecommunications, health care, lodging and catering, teaching, and municipality jobs in five countries; a total of 1,085 subjects completed the employee questionnaire on health hazards, needs, and acceptability. Results. The method demonstrated its utility in obtaining and summarizing the necessary data. Feasibility was assessed for the 16 test communities. Conclusion. The procedure can be customized; it has a high degree of face validity or understandability, and it is applicable in a wide variety of settings.
AB - Background. A simple empirically based method for assessment of the feasibility of workplace health promotion programs is described, focusing on cancer hazards (lifestyles, workplace hazards, deficient early detection). The basic components of feasibility are addressed: extent of hazards; needs of employees for hazard reduction and acceptability of WHP; and social context. Methods. The procedure consists of six modules: guidelines on feasibility assessment; employee questionnaire; interview checklists for probing attitudes of management and partners (social context); data form; debriefing; and assessment of feasibility. Pretesting was completed in 16 workplace communities representing industry, construction, transport, telecommunications, health care, lodging and catering, teaching, and municipality jobs in five countries; a total of 1,085 subjects completed the employee questionnaire on health hazards, needs, and acceptability. Results. The method demonstrated its utility in obtaining and summarizing the necessary data. Feasibility was assessed for the 16 test communities. Conclusion. The procedure can be customized; it has a high degree of face validity or understandability, and it is applicable in a wide variety of settings.
KW - Acceptability
KW - Cancer
KW - Hazards
KW - Needs
KW - Prevention
KW - Social context
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/18644370003
U2 - 10.1006/pmed.2002.1065
DO - 10.1006/pmed.2002.1065
M3 - Article
C2 - 12202065
AN - SCOPUS:18644370003
SN - 0091-7435
VL - 35
SP - 232
EP - 240
JO - Preventive Medicine
JF - Preventive Medicine
IS - 3
ER -