TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the Genomic Landscape of Cervical Cancers
T2 - Clinical Opportunities and Therapeutic Targets
AU - Friedman, Claire F.
AU - Ravichandran, Vignesh
AU - Miller, Kathryn
AU - Vanderbilt, Chad
AU - Zhou, Qin
AU - Iasonos, Alexia
AU - Vivek, Malavika
AU - Mishra, Pamela
AU - Leitao, Mario M.
AU - Broach, Vance
AU - Sonoda, Yukio
AU - Kyi, Chrisann
AU - Zamarin, Dmitriy
AU - O’Cearbhaill, Roisin E.
AU - Konner, Jason
AU - Berger, Michael F.
AU - Weigelt, Britta
AU - Boroujeni, Amir Momeni
AU - Park, Kay J.
AU - Aghajanian, Carol
AU - Solit, David B.
AU - Donoghue, Mark T.A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Purpose: Tumor genomic profiling is increasingly used to guide treatment strategy in patients with cancer. We integrated tumor genomic, clinical demographic, and treatment response data to assess how prospective tumor-normal sequencing impacted treatment selection in patients with cervical cancer. Experimental Design: Cervical cancers were prospectively analyzed using the MSK-IMPACT (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center – Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets) next-generation sequencing panel. Clinical data, including histology, stage at diagnosis, treatment history, clinical trial enrollment and outcomes, date of last follow-up, and survival status were obtained from medical records. Results: A total of 177 patients with cervical cancer (squamous, 69; endocervical adenocarcinoma, 50; gastric type, 22; adenosquamous, 21; and other, 15) underwent MSK-IMPACT testing. The most prevalent genomic alterations were somatic mutations or amplifications in PIK3CA (25%), ERBB2 (12%), KMT2C (10%), and KMT2D (9%). Furthermore, 13% of patients had high tumor mutational burden (TMB >10 mut/Mb), 3 of which were also microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H). Thirty-seven percent of cases had at least one potentially actionable alteration designated as a level 3B mutational event according to the FDA-recognized OncoKB tumor mutation database and treatment classification system. A total of 30 patients (17%) were enrolled on a therapeutic clinical trial, including 18 (10%) who were matched with a study based on their MSK-IMPACT results. Twenty patients (11%) participated in an immune checkpoint inhibition study for metastatic disease; 2 remain progression free at >5 years follow-up. Conclusions: Tumor genomic profiling can facilitate the selection of targeted/immunotherapies, as well as clinical trial enrollment, for patients with cervical cancer.
AB - Purpose: Tumor genomic profiling is increasingly used to guide treatment strategy in patients with cancer. We integrated tumor genomic, clinical demographic, and treatment response data to assess how prospective tumor-normal sequencing impacted treatment selection in patients with cervical cancer. Experimental Design: Cervical cancers were prospectively analyzed using the MSK-IMPACT (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center – Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets) next-generation sequencing panel. Clinical data, including histology, stage at diagnosis, treatment history, clinical trial enrollment and outcomes, date of last follow-up, and survival status were obtained from medical records. Results: A total of 177 patients with cervical cancer (squamous, 69; endocervical adenocarcinoma, 50; gastric type, 22; adenosquamous, 21; and other, 15) underwent MSK-IMPACT testing. The most prevalent genomic alterations were somatic mutations or amplifications in PIK3CA (25%), ERBB2 (12%), KMT2C (10%), and KMT2D (9%). Furthermore, 13% of patients had high tumor mutational burden (TMB >10 mut/Mb), 3 of which were also microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H). Thirty-seven percent of cases had at least one potentially actionable alteration designated as a level 3B mutational event according to the FDA-recognized OncoKB tumor mutation database and treatment classification system. A total of 30 patients (17%) were enrolled on a therapeutic clinical trial, including 18 (10%) who were matched with a study based on their MSK-IMPACT results. Twenty patients (11%) participated in an immune checkpoint inhibition study for metastatic disease; 2 remain progression free at >5 years follow-up. Conclusions: Tumor genomic profiling can facilitate the selection of targeted/immunotherapies, as well as clinical trial enrollment, for patients with cervical cancer.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85176974205
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1078
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1078
M3 - Article
C2 - 37643132
AN - SCOPUS:85176974205
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 29
SP - 4660
EP - 4668
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 22
ER -