TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the Content of YouTube Videos in Educating Patients Regarding Common Imaging Examinations
AU - Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
AU - Won, Eugene
AU - Doshi, Ankur M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American College of Radiology
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Purpose To assess the content of currently available YouTube videos seeking to educate patients regarding commonly performed imaging examinations. Methods After initial testing of possible search terms, the first two pages of YouTube search results for “CT scan,” “MRI,” “ultrasound patient,” “PET scan,” and “mammogram” were reviewed to identify educational patient videos created by health organizations. Sixty-three included videos were viewed and assessed for a range of features. Results Average views per video were highest for MRI (293,362) and mammography (151,664). Twenty-seven percent of videos used a nontraditional format (eg, animation, song, humor). All videos (100.0%) depicted a patient undergoing the examination, 84.1% a technologist, and 20.6% a radiologist; 69.8% mentioned examination lengths, 65.1% potential pain/discomfort, 41.3% potential radiation, 36.5% a radiology report/results, 27.0% the radiologist's role in interpretation, and 13.3% laboratory work. For CT, 68.8% mentioned intravenous contrast and 37.5% mentioned contrast safety. For MRI, 93.8% mentioned claustrophobia, 87.5% noise, 75.0% need to sit still, 68.8% metal safety, 50.0% intravenous contrast, and 0.0% contrast safety. For ultrasound, 85.7% mentioned use of gel. For PET, 92.3% mentioned radiotracer injection, 61.5% fasting, and 46.2% diabetic precautions. For mammography, unrobing, avoiding deodorant, and possible additional images were all mentioned by 63.6%; dense breasts were mentioned by 0.0%. Conclusions Educational patient videos on YouTube regarding common imaging examinations received high public interest and may provide a valuable patient resource. Videos most consistently provided information detailing the examination experience and less consistently provided safety information or described the presence and role of the radiologist.
AB - Purpose To assess the content of currently available YouTube videos seeking to educate patients regarding commonly performed imaging examinations. Methods After initial testing of possible search terms, the first two pages of YouTube search results for “CT scan,” “MRI,” “ultrasound patient,” “PET scan,” and “mammogram” were reviewed to identify educational patient videos created by health organizations. Sixty-three included videos were viewed and assessed for a range of features. Results Average views per video were highest for MRI (293,362) and mammography (151,664). Twenty-seven percent of videos used a nontraditional format (eg, animation, song, humor). All videos (100.0%) depicted a patient undergoing the examination, 84.1% a technologist, and 20.6% a radiologist; 69.8% mentioned examination lengths, 65.1% potential pain/discomfort, 41.3% potential radiation, 36.5% a radiology report/results, 27.0% the radiologist's role in interpretation, and 13.3% laboratory work. For CT, 68.8% mentioned intravenous contrast and 37.5% mentioned contrast safety. For MRI, 93.8% mentioned claustrophobia, 87.5% noise, 75.0% need to sit still, 68.8% metal safety, 50.0% intravenous contrast, and 0.0% contrast safety. For ultrasound, 85.7% mentioned use of gel. For PET, 92.3% mentioned radiotracer injection, 61.5% fasting, and 46.2% diabetic precautions. For mammography, unrobing, avoiding deodorant, and possible additional images were all mentioned by 63.6%; dense breasts were mentioned by 0.0%. Conclusions Educational patient videos on YouTube regarding common imaging examinations received high public interest and may provide a valuable patient resource. Videos most consistently provided information detailing the examination experience and less consistently provided safety information or described the presence and role of the radiologist.
KW - Social media
KW - YouTube
KW - patient education
KW - patient experience
KW - radiology practice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002732956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.06.038
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.06.038
M3 - Article
C2 - 27570129
AN - SCOPUS:85002732956
SN - 1558-349X
VL - 13
SP - 1509
EP - 1513
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 12
ER -