Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) can be a powerful tool for data analysis, but it can also mislead investigators, due in part to a fundamental difference between classic data analysis and data analysis using AI. A more or less limited data set is analyzed in classic data analysis, and a hypothesis is generated. That hypothesis is then tested using a separate data set, and the data are examined again. The premise is either accepted or rejected with a value p, indicating that any difference observed is due merely to chance. By contrast, a new hypothesis is generated in AI as each datum is added to the data set. We explore this discrepancy and suggest means to overcome it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 275-279 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Clinics in Dermatology |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 May 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Artificial intelligence and the scientific method: How to cope with a complete oxymoron'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver