Are second-trimester minor sonographic markers for Down syndrome useful in patients who have undergone first-trimester combined screening?

Monica Sood, Burton Rochelson, David Krantz, Rachel Ravens, Hima Tam Tam, Nidhi Vohra, Dawnette Lewis, Bidisha Ray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine efficacy of minor markers for detection of Down syndrome (DS) in a population prescreened with first-trimester combined screening (FTS). Study Design: FTS was modified using established likelihood ratios to generate a new composite risk (NCR). Results: Of 3845 women, 390 had ≥1 marker. There were 10/3845 cases of DS; 3 were among patients with low-risk FTS (n = 3727). In 55 patients, NCR adjusted the risk from low to high without increasing detection rate. NCR did not modify risk to allow for detection of the 3 DS among patients with low-risk FTS even though 2 of these fetuses had 1 minor marker each. There were 7 DS among patients with high-risk FTS (n = 118). Use of NCR increased positive predictive value from 7/118 (5.1%) to 7/53 (13.2%). Conclusion: Screening for minor markers is useful in patients with high-risk FTS. It is of questionable benefit in patients with low-risk FTS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)408.e1-408.e4
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume203
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Down syndrome screening
  • first trimester
  • genetic sonogram
  • minor markers
  • trisomy 21

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are second-trimester minor sonographic markers for Down syndrome useful in patients who have undergone first-trimester combined screening?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this