TY - JOUR
T1 - Appropriateness of twenty-four-hour antibiotic prophylaxis after spinal surgery in which a drain is utilized
T2 - A prospective randomized study
AU - Takemoto, Richelle C.
AU - Lonner, Baron
AU - Andres, Tate
AU - Park, Justin
AU - Ricart-Hoffiz, Pedro
AU - Bendo, John
AU - Goldstein, Jeffrey
AU - Spivak, Jeffrey
AU - Errico, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 By the journal of bone and joint surgery, incorporated.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background: Wound drains that are left in place for a prolonged period of time have a higher rate of bacterial contamination. Following spinal surgery, a drain is often left in place for a longer period of time if it maintains a high output. Given the major consequences of an infection following spinal surgery and the lack of data with regard to the use of antibiotics and drains, we performed a study of patients with a drain following spinal surgery to compare infection rates between those who were treated with antibiotics for twenty-four hours and those who received antibiotics for the duration for which the drain was in place. Methods: We performed a prospective randomized trial of 314 patients who underwent multilevel thoracolumbar spinal surgery followed by use of a postoperative drain. The patients were randomized into two groups, one of which received perioperative antibiotics for twenty-four hours (twenty-four-hour group) and the other of which received antibiotics for the duration that the drain was in place (drain-duration group). Data collected included demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, type of spinal surgery, and surgical site infection. Results: Twenty-one (12.4%) of the 170 patients in the twenty-four-hour group and nineteen (13.2%) of the 144 in the drain-duration group developed a surgical site infection (p = 0.48). There were no significant differences between the twenty-four-hour and drain-duration groups with respect to demographic characteristics (except for the American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification), operative time, type of surgery, drain output, or length of hospital stay. Conclusions: Continuing perioperative administration of antibiotics for the entire duration that a drain is in place after spinal surgery did not decrease the rate of surgical site infections. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
AB - Background: Wound drains that are left in place for a prolonged period of time have a higher rate of bacterial contamination. Following spinal surgery, a drain is often left in place for a longer period of time if it maintains a high output. Given the major consequences of an infection following spinal surgery and the lack of data with regard to the use of antibiotics and drains, we performed a study of patients with a drain following spinal surgery to compare infection rates between those who were treated with antibiotics for twenty-four hours and those who received antibiotics for the duration for which the drain was in place. Methods: We performed a prospective randomized trial of 314 patients who underwent multilevel thoracolumbar spinal surgery followed by use of a postoperative drain. The patients were randomized into two groups, one of which received perioperative antibiotics for twenty-four hours (twenty-four-hour group) and the other of which received antibiotics for the duration that the drain was in place (drain-duration group). Data collected included demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, type of spinal surgery, and surgical site infection. Results: Twenty-one (12.4%) of the 170 patients in the twenty-four-hour group and nineteen (13.2%) of the 144 in the drain-duration group developed a surgical site infection (p = 0.48). There were no significant differences between the twenty-four-hour and drain-duration groups with respect to demographic characteristics (except for the American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification), operative time, type of surgery, drain output, or length of hospital stay. Conclusions: Continuing perioperative administration of antibiotics for the entire duration that a drain is in place after spinal surgery did not decrease the rate of surgical site infections. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940109260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.L.00782
DO - 10.2106/JBJS.L.00782
M3 - Article
C2 - 26085531
AN - SCOPUS:84940109260
SN - 0021-9355
VL - 97
SP - 979
EP - 986
JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
IS - 12
ER -