TY - JOUR
T1 - Antispasmodic medications may be associated with reduced recovery during inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic spinal cord injury
AU - Theriault, Eric R.
AU - Huang, Vincent
AU - Whiteneck, Gale
AU - Dijkers, Marcel P.
AU - Harel, Noam Y.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by NIDILRR grant H133N060027 (MPD), NIDILRR grants H133A060103 and H133N060005 (GW), and VA RR&D grant B0881-W (NYH).
Funding Information:
Funding This work was funded by NIDILRR grant H133N060027 (MPD), NIDILRR grants H133A060103 and H133N060005 (GW), and VA RR&D grant B0881-W (NYH).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © The Academy of Spinal Cord Injury Professionals, Inc. 2018.
PY - 2018/1/2
Y1 - 2018/1/2
N2 - Objective: To determine whether antispasmodic medications are associated with neurological and functional outcomes during the first year after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design/Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from six inpatient SCI rehabilitation centers. Baseline-adjusted outcomes at discharge and one-year follow-up were compared using analysis of covariance between patients who received antispasmodic medication on at least 5 days during inpatient rehabilitation and patients who did not. Outcome measures: Rasch-transformed motor subscore of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM); International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor scores, grade, and level. Results: Of 1,259 patients, 59.8%, 35.4%, and 4.8% were injured at the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral levels, respectively. 65.6% had motor complete injury. Rasch-transformed motor FIM score at admission averaged 23.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 22.4–24.2). Total motor score averaged 39.2 (95% CI 37.8–40.6). 685 patients (54.4%) received one or more antispasmodic medications on at least 5 days. After controlling for demographic and injury variables at admission, Rasch-transformed motor FIM scores at discharge were significantly lower (P = 0.018) in patients receiving antispasmodic medications than in those who did not. This trend persisted in secondary analyses for cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral subgroups. Multivariate regression showed that receiving antispasmodic medication significantly contributed to discharge motor FIM outcome. At one-year follow-up, no outcomes significantly differed between patients ON or OFF antispasmodics. Conclusions: Antispasmodic medications may be associated with decreased functional recovery at discharge from inpatient traumatic SCI rehabilitation. Randomized prospective studies are needed to directly evaluate the effects of antispasmodic medication on recovery.
AB - Objective: To determine whether antispasmodic medications are associated with neurological and functional outcomes during the first year after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Design/Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from six inpatient SCI rehabilitation centers. Baseline-adjusted outcomes at discharge and one-year follow-up were compared using analysis of covariance between patients who received antispasmodic medication on at least 5 days during inpatient rehabilitation and patients who did not. Outcome measures: Rasch-transformed motor subscore of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM); International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury motor scores, grade, and level. Results: Of 1,259 patients, 59.8%, 35.4%, and 4.8% were injured at the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral levels, respectively. 65.6% had motor complete injury. Rasch-transformed motor FIM score at admission averaged 23.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 22.4–24.2). Total motor score averaged 39.2 (95% CI 37.8–40.6). 685 patients (54.4%) received one or more antispasmodic medications on at least 5 days. After controlling for demographic and injury variables at admission, Rasch-transformed motor FIM scores at discharge were significantly lower (P = 0.018) in patients receiving antispasmodic medications than in those who did not. This trend persisted in secondary analyses for cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral subgroups. Multivariate regression showed that receiving antispasmodic medication significantly contributed to discharge motor FIM outcome. At one-year follow-up, no outcomes significantly differed between patients ON or OFF antispasmodics. Conclusions: Antispasmodic medications may be associated with decreased functional recovery at discharge from inpatient traumatic SCI rehabilitation. Randomized prospective studies are needed to directly evaluate the effects of antispasmodic medication on recovery.
KW - Muscle relaxants
KW - Muscle spasticity
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Spinal cord injuries
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994905096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10790268.2016.1245010
DO - 10.1080/10790268.2016.1245010
M3 - Article
C2 - 27841095
AN - SCOPUS:84994905096
SN - 1079-0268
VL - 41
SP - 63
EP - 71
JO - Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
JF - Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
IS - 1
ER -