TY - JOUR
T1 - Anchor points in language learning
T2 - The role of marker frequency
AU - Valian, Virginia
AU - Coulson, Seana
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was performed while the first author was Henry R. Lute Professor and the second author a Dana Foundation Fellow at Wellesley College; we gratefully acknowledge the support of the Henry R. Lute Foundation and the Dana Foundation. For her assistance with every aspect of the study, we thank Alynn Harvey. For their helpful discussion, comments, and suggestions, we thank M. C. Potter, J. J. Katz, T. G. Bever, G. Dell, R. Aslin, R. Meier, J. Morgan, and A. Levitt. We also thank the University of Rochester for its support of the first author during manuscript preparation. Correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed to Virginia Valian, Department of Psychology, Hunter College, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10021.
PY - 1988/2
Y1 - 1988/2
N2 - We examine the role of markers as anchor points in adult learning of a miniature artificial language, with and without an accompanying reference field. Two dialects of the same language were created, differing only in number of grammatical markers and "content" words. In the high-frequency dialect a given marker occurred six times as often as a given content word, while in the low-frequency dialect a given marker occurred one and a half times as often as a given content word. In Experiment 1, without a reference field, subjects in the high-frequency dialect learned the structure of the language easily, but subjects in the low-frequency dialect learned only superficial properties of the language. In Experiment 2, with a reference field, subjects in both conditions learned, but those in the high-frequency condition learned more quickly. We propose that, with or without a reference field, learners use very high-frequency markers as anchor points for distributional analysis. We discuss the implications of our results for first language learning.
AB - We examine the role of markers as anchor points in adult learning of a miniature artificial language, with and without an accompanying reference field. Two dialects of the same language were created, differing only in number of grammatical markers and "content" words. In the high-frequency dialect a given marker occurred six times as often as a given content word, while in the low-frequency dialect a given marker occurred one and a half times as often as a given content word. In Experiment 1, without a reference field, subjects in the high-frequency dialect learned the structure of the language easily, but subjects in the low-frequency dialect learned only superficial properties of the language. In Experiment 2, with a reference field, subjects in both conditions learned, but those in the high-frequency condition learned more quickly. We propose that, with or without a reference field, learners use very high-frequency markers as anchor points for distributional analysis. We discuss the implications of our results for first language learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002371119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90049-6
DO - 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90049-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0002371119
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 27
SP - 71
EP - 86
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
IS - 1
ER -