Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analyzing racial and ethnic disparities among geriatric patients undergoing elective versus emergent colorectal procedures: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) analysis

  • Spencer T. Johnson
  • , Venu Bangla
  • , Adriano Cuadros
  • , Alexandra Z. Agathis
  • , Jeanne Wu
  • , Celia M. Divino

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Non-elective colorectal surgeries are associated with an increased risk of complications compared to elective procedures, which is accentuated amongst geriatric patients. This study examines racial/ethnic disparities in rates of elective versus non-elective colorectal procedures among geriatric patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included data from patients aged ≥65 registered in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Using multivariate logistic regression, we examined associations between race/ethnicity and elective versus non-elective surgical status. Results: Among 79,497 patients included, 24,544 (30.9 ​%) received non-elective colorectal surgery. 81.1 ​% of patients were White, 8.93 ​% were Black, 5.3 ​% were Hispanic, 4.1 ​% were Asian, and 0.6 ​% were NAPI. Multivariate analysis revealed higher odds ratios for receiving non-elective surgery amongst Black and Hispanic patients (Black ​= ​1.38, 95 ​% CI 1.30–1.47, p ​< ​0.01; Hispanic ​= ​1.54, 95 ​% CI 1.43–1.67, p ​< ​0.01). Conclusions: Black and Hispanic geriatric patients were more likely to receive non-elective procedures.

Original languageEnglish
Article number116397
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume252
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2026

Keywords

  • Case acuity
  • Clinical outcomes
  • Colectomy
  • Geriatric care
  • Healthcare disparities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analyzing racial and ethnic disparities among geriatric patients undergoing elective versus emergent colorectal procedures: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this