Analytical evaluation of i-STAT portable clinical analyzer and use by nonlaboratory health-care professionals

Ellis Jacobs, Elizabeth Vadasdi, Laszlo Sarkozi, Neville Colman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

136 Scopus citations

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of the i-STAT Portable Clinical Analyzer, a hand-held instrument that, with its current cartridge, analyzes for electrolytes, urea nitrogen, glucose, and hematocrit in ∼60 μL of whole blood in ∼90 s. Accuracy, imprecision, and linearity studies were performed with aqueous controls and standards and by split-sample analysis. Intrarun imprecision (CV) ranged from 0.34% to 3.97%. Total imprecision over a 2-month period ranged from 0.42% to 4.83%, with urea nitrogen and glucose analyses generating the higher values. Patients' results from the Portable Clinical Analyzer correlated well with those obtained for whole blood or plasma by the Nova Stat Profile 5, the Beckman Synchron CX3, or the Technicon H1 Hematology Analyzer, with Sy1x values <0.2 mmol/L for potassium; <1.5 mmol/L for sodium, glucose, and urea nitrogen; <2.4 mmol/L for chloride; and <2.4% for hematocrit. We also ascertained imprecision and accuracy of the system placed in a cardiothoracic intensive-care unit and operated by nurses. There were no significant differences in either the imprecision or accuracy of the system in this setting. We conclude that operator technique is not a factor in the analytical performance of the system and that it can be used by nonlaboratorians with a high degree of confidence that reliable results will be obtained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1069-1074
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Chemistry
Volume39
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1993

Keywords

  • Biosensors
  • Critical-care medicine
  • Electrochemical sensors
  • Electrolytes
  • Emergency analyses
  • Glucose
  • Point-of-care testing
  • Urea nitrogen

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analytical evaluation of i-STAT portable clinical analyzer and use by nonlaboratory health-care professionals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this