TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization Outcomes in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
T2 - A Single-Center Experience
AU - Marti, Josep
AU - Giacca, Massimo
AU - Alshebeeb, Kutaiba
AU - Bahl, Sumeet
AU - Hua, Charles
AU - Horn, Jeremy C.
AU - BouAyache, Jad
AU - Patel, Rahul
AU - Facciuto, Marcelo
AU - Schwartz, Myron
AU - Florman, Sander
AU - Kim, Edward
AU - Gunasekaran, Ganesh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Purpose: To analyze outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of survival, recurrence, and complications was performed in 82 patients with HCC undergoing preoperative PVE and surgical treatment with curative intention from June 2006 to December 2014. Results: Rate of major adverse events after PVE was 11% with no mortality. Twenty-eight (34.1%) patients showed radiologic progression of HCC after PVE; 72 patients (87.8%) eventually were accepted as surgical candidates. Median interval between PVE and surgery was 37 days, and 69 patients (84.1%) ultimately underwent surgical resection. At 1 and 3 years, disease-free survival rates were 81.3% and 53.1%, respectively, and overall patient survival rates were 77.5% and 63.1%. Compared with patients accepted as surgical candidates, patients who did not undergo surgery had a higher median number of HCC tumors (1 [range, 1–5] vs 2 [range, 1–4], P =.031). At 1 and 3 years, patients with disease progression after PVE but who still underwent surgical resection showed similar recurrence-free (90% vs 79.6% and 75% vs 48.6%) and overall (72.2% vs 78.4% and 57.8% vs 64%) survival rates as the rest of the patients who underwent resection. Conclusions: PVE is a safe technique with good outcomes that potentially increases the number of patients with initially unresectable HCC who can be offered resection. Radiologic progression after PVE should not be seen as a contraindication to offer resection if it is still deemed possible.
AB - Purpose: To analyze outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of survival, recurrence, and complications was performed in 82 patients with HCC undergoing preoperative PVE and surgical treatment with curative intention from June 2006 to December 2014. Results: Rate of major adverse events after PVE was 11% with no mortality. Twenty-eight (34.1%) patients showed radiologic progression of HCC after PVE; 72 patients (87.8%) eventually were accepted as surgical candidates. Median interval between PVE and surgery was 37 days, and 69 patients (84.1%) ultimately underwent surgical resection. At 1 and 3 years, disease-free survival rates were 81.3% and 53.1%, respectively, and overall patient survival rates were 77.5% and 63.1%. Compared with patients accepted as surgical candidates, patients who did not undergo surgery had a higher median number of HCC tumors (1 [range, 1–5] vs 2 [range, 1–4], P =.031). At 1 and 3 years, patients with disease progression after PVE but who still underwent surgical resection showed similar recurrence-free (90% vs 79.6% and 75% vs 48.6%) and overall (72.2% vs 78.4% and 57.8% vs 64%) survival rates as the rest of the patients who underwent resection. Conclusions: PVE is a safe technique with good outcomes that potentially increases the number of patients with initially unresectable HCC who can be offered resection. Radiologic progression after PVE should not be seen as a contraindication to offer resection if it is still deemed possible.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046722678&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.01.780
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.01.780
M3 - Article
C2 - 29735260
AN - SCOPUS:85046722678
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 29
SP - 920
EP - 926
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 7
ER -