TY - JOUR
T1 - An Ounce of Prevention
T2 - A Review of the Most Common Errors in OB/GYN Ultrasound Leading to Litigation and How to Avoid Them
AU - Rafael, Timothy J.
AU - Chervenak, Frank A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s).
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - The use of ultrasound in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) has become ubiquitous. As OB/GYN is a higher-risk specialty pertaining to the risk of litigation, it is no surprise that lawsuits involving ultrasound in OB/GYN are not uncommon. Errors in ultrasound are not rare, with certain types of errors seemingly more prone to litigation. Upon examination of the past 40 years of literature, it appears that the most frequent types of errors fall into one of three categories: (1) technical/procedural, (2) perception/interpretation, and (3) communication/documentation. The aim of this review is to break down the types of ultrasound errors that fall into these categories and utilize “take-home” summary points as a way of strategizing the prevention of these types of errors. Among other methods, these summary points emphasize adequate ultrasound training and continuing education, knowledge of the guidelines, ample patient counseling, effective communication with referring providers, and meticulous documentation. Upon completion of this review, it is hoped that the reader has an appreciation of the steps a practitioner can take to avoid these types of lawsuits in the future.
AB - The use of ultrasound in the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) has become ubiquitous. As OB/GYN is a higher-risk specialty pertaining to the risk of litigation, it is no surprise that lawsuits involving ultrasound in OB/GYN are not uncommon. Errors in ultrasound are not rare, with certain types of errors seemingly more prone to litigation. Upon examination of the past 40 years of literature, it appears that the most frequent types of errors fall into one of three categories: (1) technical/procedural, (2) perception/interpretation, and (3) communication/documentation. The aim of this review is to break down the types of ultrasound errors that fall into these categories and utilize “take-home” summary points as a way of strategizing the prevention of these types of errors. Among other methods, these summary points emphasize adequate ultrasound training and continuing education, knowledge of the guidelines, ample patient counseling, effective communication with referring providers, and meticulous documentation. Upon completion of this review, it is hoped that the reader has an appreciation of the steps a practitioner can take to avoid these types of lawsuits in the future.
KW - Anomaly
KW - Congenital heart malformations
KW - Down syndrome
KW - Prevention
KW - Re-scanning
KW - Sonography
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122150443&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1817
DO - 10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1817
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85122150443
VL - 15
SP - 380
EP - 386
JO - Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
SN - 0973-614X
IS - 4
ER -