An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction

Per Trobisch, Jonathan M. Mahoney, Emily K. Eichenlaub, Christopher L. Antonacci, Laury Cuddihy, Dhara B. Amin, Dominic Razo-Castaneda, Mattan R. Orbach, Joshua P. McGuckin, Brandon S. Bucklen, M. Darryl Antonacci, Randal R. Betz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the motion-preserving properties of vertebral body tethering with varying cord/screw constructs and cord thicknesses in cadaveric thoracolumbar spines. Methods: In vitro flexibility tests were performed on six fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines (T1-L5) (2 M, 4F) with a median age of 63 (59-to-80). An ± 8 Nm load was applied to determine range of motion (ROM) in flexion–extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Specimens were tested with screws (T5-L4) and without cords. Single (4.0 mm and 5.0 mm) and double (4.0 mm) cord constructs were sequentially tensioned to 100 N and tested: (1) Single 4.0 mm and (2) 5.0 mm cords (T5-T12); (3) Double 4.0 mm cords (T5-12); (4) Single 4.0 mm and (5) 5.0 mm cord (T12-L4); (6) Double 4.0 mm cords (T12-L4). Results: In the thoracic spine (T5-T12), 4.0–5.0 mm single-cord constructs showed slight reductions in FE and 27–33% reductions in LB compared to intact, while double-cord constructs showed reductions of 24% and 40%, respectively. In the lumbar spine (T12-L4), double-cord constructs had greater reductions in FE (24%), LB (74%), and AR (25%) compared to intact, while single-cord constructs exhibited reductions of 2–4%, 68–69%, and 19–20%, respectively. Conclusions: The present biomechanical study found similar motion for 4.0–5.0 mm single-cord constructs and the least motion for double-cord constructs in the thoracic and lumbar spine suggesting that larger diameter 5.0 mm cords may be a more promising motion-preserving option, due to their increased durability compared to smaller cords. Future clinical studies are necessary to determine the impact of these findings on patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1173-1186
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Fusionless
  • Growth modulation
  • Motion preservation
  • Scoliosis
  • Vertebral body tethering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this