TY - JOUR
T1 - An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction
AU - Trobisch, Per
AU - Mahoney, Jonathan M.
AU - Eichenlaub, Emily K.
AU - Antonacci, Christopher L.
AU - Cuddihy, Laury
AU - Amin, Dhara B.
AU - Razo-Castaneda, Dominic
AU - Orbach, Mattan R.
AU - McGuckin, Joshua P.
AU - Bucklen, Brandon S.
AU - Antonacci, M. Darryl
AU - Betz, Randal R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the motion-preserving properties of vertebral body tethering with varying cord/screw constructs and cord thicknesses in cadaveric thoracolumbar spines. Methods: In vitro flexibility tests were performed on six fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines (T1-L5) (2 M, 4F) with a median age of 63 (59-to-80). An ± 8 Nm load was applied to determine range of motion (ROM) in flexion–extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Specimens were tested with screws (T5-L4) and without cords. Single (4.0 mm and 5.0 mm) and double (4.0 mm) cord constructs were sequentially tensioned to 100 N and tested: (1) Single 4.0 mm and (2) 5.0 mm cords (T5-T12); (3) Double 4.0 mm cords (T5-12); (4) Single 4.0 mm and (5) 5.0 mm cord (T12-L4); (6) Double 4.0 mm cords (T12-L4). Results: In the thoracic spine (T5-T12), 4.0–5.0 mm single-cord constructs showed slight reductions in FE and 27–33% reductions in LB compared to intact, while double-cord constructs showed reductions of 24% and 40%, respectively. In the lumbar spine (T12-L4), double-cord constructs had greater reductions in FE (24%), LB (74%), and AR (25%) compared to intact, while single-cord constructs exhibited reductions of 2–4%, 68–69%, and 19–20%, respectively. Conclusions: The present biomechanical study found similar motion for 4.0–5.0 mm single-cord constructs and the least motion for double-cord constructs in the thoracic and lumbar spine suggesting that larger diameter 5.0 mm cords may be a more promising motion-preserving option, due to their increased durability compared to smaller cords. Future clinical studies are necessary to determine the impact of these findings on patient outcomes.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the motion-preserving properties of vertebral body tethering with varying cord/screw constructs and cord thicknesses in cadaveric thoracolumbar spines. Methods: In vitro flexibility tests were performed on six fresh-frozen human cadaveric spines (T1-L5) (2 M, 4F) with a median age of 63 (59-to-80). An ± 8 Nm load was applied to determine range of motion (ROM) in flexion–extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Specimens were tested with screws (T5-L4) and without cords. Single (4.0 mm and 5.0 mm) and double (4.0 mm) cord constructs were sequentially tensioned to 100 N and tested: (1) Single 4.0 mm and (2) 5.0 mm cords (T5-T12); (3) Double 4.0 mm cords (T5-12); (4) Single 4.0 mm and (5) 5.0 mm cord (T12-L4); (6) Double 4.0 mm cords (T12-L4). Results: In the thoracic spine (T5-T12), 4.0–5.0 mm single-cord constructs showed slight reductions in FE and 27–33% reductions in LB compared to intact, while double-cord constructs showed reductions of 24% and 40%, respectively. In the lumbar spine (T12-L4), double-cord constructs had greater reductions in FE (24%), LB (74%), and AR (25%) compared to intact, while single-cord constructs exhibited reductions of 2–4%, 68–69%, and 19–20%, respectively. Conclusions: The present biomechanical study found similar motion for 4.0–5.0 mm single-cord constructs and the least motion for double-cord constructs in the thoracic and lumbar spine suggesting that larger diameter 5.0 mm cords may be a more promising motion-preserving option, due to their increased durability compared to smaller cords. Future clinical studies are necessary to determine the impact of these findings on patient outcomes.
KW - Fusionless
KW - Growth modulation
KW - Motion preservation
KW - Scoliosis
KW - Vertebral body tethering
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149231124&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00586-023-07608-5
DO - 10.1007/s00586-023-07608-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85149231124
SN - 0940-6719
VL - 32
SP - 1173
EP - 1186
JO - European Spine Journal
JF - European Spine Journal
IS - 4
ER -