[An investigation into perception of preventability of injuries and knowledge needs on injury prevention among 684 among undergraduates of a university].

Xiang He, Xiaotao Zhang, Aichun Tan, Qiong He, Tianmu Chen, Danping Tian, Yuanxiu Huang, Jing Dong, Lin Gao, Ming Hu, Guoqing Hu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To examine the perception of the preventability of injury and needs on injury prevention knowledge among undergraduates. Stratified sampling and cluster sampling were used to select undergraduate students from 12 classes of three specialized fields of Central South University. A survey was carried out to understand beliefs of the preventability of injuries and knowledge needs on injury prevention. Over 80% of students believed that drowning (605/684), road traffic injuries (601/684), burns and suicide/self-harm (591/684) are most preventable, while merely 59.6% (408/684) and 56.4% (386/684) of students considered cut/pierce and homicide/assault most preventable. The beliefs of preventability of common injuries were not statistically significant between non-public-health medical students, public health students, and non-medical students (P > 0.05), with an exception for poisoning. 18.1% of students (124) reported to received short-term injury training or take lecture for injury prevention, and 27.9% of students (191) had ever read injury-related books. There were 60% (410/684) and 56% (383/684) of students respectively reporting needs for prevention knowledge about poisoning and road traffic injuries. Many undergraduates hold incorrect perception on the preventability of injuries, quite a few report knowledge needs for injury prevention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-94
Number of pages3
JournalWei sheng yan jiu = Journal of hygiene research
Volume42
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[An investigation into perception of preventability of injuries and knowledge needs on injury prevention among 684 among undergraduates of a university].'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this