TY - JOUR
T1 - An assessment of serological assays for sars-cov-2 as surrogates for authentic virus neutralization
AU - Wohlgemuth, Nicholas
AU - Whitt, Kendall
AU - Cherry, Sean
AU - Roubidoux, Ericka Kirkpatrick
AU - Lin, Chun Yang
AU - Allison, Kim J.
AU - Gowen, Ashleigh
AU - Freiden, Pamela
AU - Kaitlynn Allen, E.
AU - Gaur, Aditya H.
AU - Estepp, Jeremie H.
AU - Tang, Li
AU - Mori, Tomi
AU - Hijano, Diego R.
AU - Hakim, Hana
AU - McGargill, Maureen A.
AU - Krammer, Florian
AU - Whitt, Michael A.
AU - Wolf, Joshua
AU - Thomas, Paul G.
AU - Schultz-Cherry, Stacey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in late 2019 and has since caused a global pandemic resulting in millions of cases and deaths. Diagnostic tools and serological assays are critical for controlling the outbreak, especially assays designed to quantitate neutralizing antibody levels, considered the best correlate of protection. As vaccines become increasingly available, it is important to identify reliable methods for measuring neutralizing antibody responses that correlate with authentic virus neutralization but can be performed outside biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratories. While many neutralizing assays using pseudotyped virus have been developed, there have been few studies comparing the different assays to each other as surrogates for authentic virus neutralization. Here, we characterized three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and three pseudotyped vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) neutralization assays and assessed their concordance with authentic virus neutralization. The most accurate assays for predicting authentic virus neutralization were luciferase- and secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP)-expressing pseudotyped virus neutralizations, followed by green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing pseudotyped virus neutralization, and then the ELISAs.
AB - Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in late 2019 and has since caused a global pandemic resulting in millions of cases and deaths. Diagnostic tools and serological assays are critical for controlling the outbreak, especially assays designed to quantitate neutralizing antibody levels, considered the best correlate of protection. As vaccines become increasingly available, it is important to identify reliable methods for measuring neutralizing antibody responses that correlate with authentic virus neutralization but can be performed outside biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratories. While many neutralizing assays using pseudotyped virus have been developed, there have been few studies comparing the different assays to each other as surrogates for authentic virus neutralization. Here, we characterized three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and three pseudotyped vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) neutralization assays and assessed their concordance with authentic virus neutralization. The most accurate assays for predicting authentic virus neutralization were luciferase- and secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP)-expressing pseudotyped virus neutralizations, followed by green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing pseudotyped virus neutralization, and then the ELISAs.
KW - Immunoassays
KW - Neutralizing antibodies
KW - SARS-CoV-2
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85119128940
U2 - 10.1128/Spectrum.01059-21
DO - 10.1128/Spectrum.01059-21
M3 - Article
C2 - 34704832
AN - SCOPUS:85119128940
SN - 2165-0497
VL - 9
JO - Microbiology Spectrum
JF - Microbiology Spectrum
IS - 2
M1 - e01059-21
ER -