An academic debate: OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: PREEMPT-derived vs “customized” dosing/injection paradigm

Mark W. Green, John F. Rothrock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2010 onabotulinumtoxinA (OnabotA) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chronic migraine (CM). Data supporting approval were derived primarily from two parallel placebo-controlled trials, the PREEMPT studies. Many clinicians and research investigators critical of those data have recommended that the dosing/injection paradigm for treating CM be “customized” to the needs of the individual patient rather than administered in a uniform fashion conforming to the methodology utilized in the PREEMPT studies. In this paper the authors debate the issue of whether treatment of CM with OnabotA should be standardized versus customized.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)116-119
Number of pages4
JournalToxicon
Volume147
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2018

Keywords

  • Chronic migraine
  • OnabotulinumtoxinA
  • PREEMPT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An academic debate: OnabotulinumtoxinA for chronic migraine: PREEMPT-derived vs “customized” dosing/injection paradigm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this