Abstract
Background: Allergen-specific IL-4+ and IL-13+ CD4+ cells (type 2 cells) are essential for helping B cells to class-switch to IgE and establishing an allergic milieu in the gastrointestinal tract. The role of T cells in established food allergy is less clear. Objective: We examined the food allergen–specific T-cell response in participants of 2 food allergen immunotherapy trials to assess the relationship of the T-cell response to clinical phenotypes, including response to immunotherapy. Methods: Blood was obtained from 84 participants with peanut allergy and 142 participants with egg allergy who underwent double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges. Peanut- and egg-responsive T cells were identified by CD154 upregulation after stimulation with the respective extract. Intracellular cytokines and chemokine receptors were also detected. The response to peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (Peanut Epicutaneous Phase II Immunotherapy Clinical Trial [CoFAR6]; 49 participants receiving epicutaneous immunotherapy) and egg oral immunotherapy or a baked egg diet (Baked Egg or Egg Oral Immunotherapy for Children With Egg Allergy [CoFAR7]; 92 participants) was monitored over time. Results: Peanut-specific type 2 and CCR6+ T cells were negatively correlated with each other and differently associated with immune parameters, including specific IgE level and basophil activation test result. At baseline, type 2 cells, but not CCR6+ cells, were predictive of clinical parameters, including a successfully consumed dose of peanut and baked egg tolerance. Exposure to peanut or egg immunotherapy was associated with a decrease in type 2 cell frequency. At baseline, high egg-specific type 2 cell frequency was the immune feature most predictive of oral immunotherapy failure. Conclusion: Food-specific type 2 T cells at baseline are informative of threshold of reactivity and response to immunotherapy.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1373-1382.e12 |
Journal | Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology |
Volume | 149 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2022 |
Keywords
- T cells
- T2 cells
- basophil activation test
- double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge
- epicutaneous immunotherapy
- immunoglobulins
- oral immunotherapy
Access to Document
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Allergen-specific T cells and clinical features of food allergy: Lessons from CoFAR immunotherapy cohorts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
Allergen-specific T cells and clinical features of food allergy : Lessons from CoFAR immunotherapy cohorts. / Berin, M. Cecilia; Agashe, Charuta; Burks, A. Wesley et al.
In: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 149, No. 4, 04.2022, p. 1373-1382.e12.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Allergen-specific T cells and clinical features of food allergy
T2 - Lessons from CoFAR immunotherapy cohorts
AU - Berin, M. Cecilia
AU - Agashe, Charuta
AU - Burks, A. Wesley
AU - Chiang, David
AU - Davidson, Wendy F.
AU - Dawson, Peter
AU - Grishin, Alexander
AU - Henning, Alice K.
AU - Jones, Stacie M.
AU - Kim, Edwin H.
AU - Leung, Donald Y.M.
AU - Masilamani, Madhan
AU - Scurlock, Amy M.
AU - Sicherer, Scott H.
AU - Wood, Robert A.
AU - Sampson, Hugh A.
N1 - Funding Information: Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. C. Berin reports grant support to her institution from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). A. W. Burks reports being a minority stock holder in Allertein and Mastcell; serving on scientific advisory boards of Aimmune Therapeutics, Consortia TX, Inc, and Prota Therapeutics; performing consultancy for Astella Pharma Global Development, DBV Technologies, kaléo, N-fold LLC, ALK-Abelló, Inc, and UKKO, Inc; and receiving grant support to his institution from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/NIAID, NIH/National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Johns Hopkins/NIH, Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE), and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, in addition to royalty payments from UpToDate and royalties paid from the following US patents: 7879977, 6835824, 6486311, 6441142, 5973121, and 5558869. P. Dawson and A. K. Henning are employed by Emmes, which received grant support from the Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation/NIH/NIAID. A. Grishin reports receiving consultant fees from N-Fold Therapeutics. S. M. Jones reports research advisory board membership with FARE and consultancy and scientific advisory board membership with Aimmune Therapeutics; grant support to her institution from the NIH/NIAID, Immune Tolerance Network, Aimmune Therapeutics, DBV Technologies, Astellas, Regeneron, Genentech, and FARE; and performance of Center for Scientific Review review/preparation for DBV Technologies on behalf of Emmes. E. H. Kim reports clinical medical advisory board membership with DBV Technologies; consultancy with Aimmune Therapeutics, DBV Technologies, AllerGenis, Allakos, Ukko, and Vibrant America; and grant support to his institution from the NIH/NIAID, NIH/National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, FARE, and the Wallace Research Foundation. D. Y. M. Leung receives grant support to his institution from the NIH/NIAID and serves on the data safety monitoring committee of Aimmune Therapeutics. M. Masilamani is employed by Bristol-Myers Squibb. H. A. Sampson reports receiving consultant fees from DBV Technologies, Siolta Therapeutics and N-Fold LLC, and royalties for various textbooks; holding stock options in DBV Technologies and N-FOLD; receiving grant support to his institution from the Immune Tolerance Network and NIH/NIAID; and serving as an unpaid Board of Directors member and advisor to AllerGenis. A. M. Scurlock reports grant support to her institution from the NIH/NIAID, Immune Tolerance Network, Aimmune Therapeutics, DBV Technologies, Astellas, Regeneron, Genentech, and FARE and clinical medical advisory board membership with DBV Technologies. S. H. Sicherer reports grants from NIH/NIAID and FARE, and royalty payments from UpToDate, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, and Johns Hopkins University Press. R. A. Wood reports royalty payments from UpToDate and grant support to his institution from the NIH/NIAID, Aimmune Therapeutics, DBV Technologies, Astellas, Regeneron, HAL-Allergy, and Sanofi. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest. Funding Information: Supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (grants U19AI066738, U01AI066560, and UM2AI130836). Also supported by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (grant UM1AI130781), the University of North Carolina (grant UM1AI30936), Mount Sinai University (grant UM1AI130570), National Jewish Health (grant UM1AI130780), and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (grant UM1AI30838), which were supported by the NIH-NIAID, and by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (grant UL1TR003107), the University of North Carolina (grant UL1TR001111), Mount Sinai University (grant UL1TR000067), National Jewish Health (grant UL1TR002535), and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (grant UL1TR000424), which were supported by the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the NIH. The study's contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the NCRR or the NIH. Support for this trial was also provided by DBV Technologies, Inc (Montrouge, France), through funds provided to the Consortium for Food Allergy Research. Protocol development, study conduct, data analysis, and article development were conducted independently of DBV. The decision and approval to publish this article was made by the authors, as investigators in CoFAR, Emmes, and the NIH/NIAID leadership. Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. C. Berin reports grant support to her institution from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). A. W. Burks reports being a minority stock holder in Allertein and Mastcell; serving on scientific advisory boards of Aimmune Therapeutics, Consortia TX, Inc, and Prota Therapeutics; performing consultancy for Astella Pharma Global Development, DBV Technologies, kal?o, N-fold LLC, ALK-Abell?, Inc, and UKKO, Inc; and receiving grant support to his institution from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/NIAID, NIH/National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Johns Hopkins/NIH, Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE), and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, in addition to royalty payments from UpToDate and royalties paid from the following US patents: 7879977, 6835824, 6486311, 6441142, 5973121, and 5558869. P. Dawson and A. K. Henning are employed by Emmes, which received grant support from the Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation/NIH/NIAID. A. Grishin reports receiving consultant fees from N-Fold Therapeutics. S. M. Jones reports research advisory board membership with FARE and consultancy and scientific advisory board membership with Aimmune Therapeutics; grant support to her institution from the NIH/NIAID, Immune Tolerance Network, Aimmune Therapeutics, DBV Technologies, Astellas, Regeneron, Genentech, and FARE; and performance of Center for Scientific Review review/preparation for DBV Technologies on behalf of Emmes. E. H. Kim reports clinical medical advisory board membership with DBV Technologies; consultancy with Aimmune Therapeutics, DBV Technologies, AllerGenis, Allakos, Ukko, and Vibrant America; and grant support to his institution from the NIH/NIAID, NIH/National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, FARE, and the Wallace Research Foundation. D. Y. M. Leung receives grant support to his institution from the NIH/NIAID and serves on the data safety monitoring committee of Aimmune Therapeutics. M. Masilamani is employed by Bristol-Myers Squibb. H. A. Sampson reports receiving consultant fees from DBV Technologies, Siolta Therapeutics and N-Fold LLC, and royalties for various textbooks; holding stock options in DBV Technologies and N-FOLD; receiving grant support to his institution from the Immune Tolerance Network and NIH/NIAID; and serving as an unpaid Board of Directors member and advisor to AllerGenis. A. M. Scurlock reports grant support to her institution from the NIH/NIAID, Immune Tolerance Network, Aimmune Therapeutics, DBV Technologies, Astellas, Regeneron, Genentech, and FARE and clinical medical advisory board membership with DBV Technologies. S. H. Sicherer reports grants from NIH/NIAID and FARE, and royalty payments from UpToDate, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, and Johns Hopkins University Press. R. A. Wood reports royalty payments from UpToDate and grant support to his institution from the NIH/NIAID, Aimmune Therapeutics, DBV Technologies, Astellas, Regeneron, HAL-Allergy, and Sanofi. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest. Funding Information: Supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (grants U19AI066738, U01AI066560 , and UM2AI130836 ). Also supported by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (grant UM1AI130781 ), the University of North Carolina (grant UM1AI30936 ), Mount Sinai University (grant UM1AI130570 ), National Jewish Health (grant UM1AI130780 ), and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (grant UM1AI30838 ), which were supported by the NIH-NIAID , and by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (grant UL1TR003107 ), the University of North Carolina (grant UL1TR001111 ), Mount Sinai University (grant UL1TR000067 ), National Jewish Health (grant UL1TR002535 ), and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (grant UL1TR000424 ), which were supported by the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the NIH. The study's contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the NCRR or the NIH. Support for this trial was also provided by DBV Technologies, Inc (Montrouge, France), through funds provided to the Consortium for Food Allergy Research. Protocol development, study conduct, data analysis, and article development were conducted independently of DBV. The decision and approval to publish this article was made by the authors, as investigators in CoFAR, Emmes, and the NIH/NIAID leadership. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Background: Allergen-specific IL-4+ and IL-13+ CD4+ cells (type 2 cells) are essential for helping B cells to class-switch to IgE and establishing an allergic milieu in the gastrointestinal tract. The role of T cells in established food allergy is less clear. Objective: We examined the food allergen–specific T-cell response in participants of 2 food allergen immunotherapy trials to assess the relationship of the T-cell response to clinical phenotypes, including response to immunotherapy. Methods: Blood was obtained from 84 participants with peanut allergy and 142 participants with egg allergy who underwent double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges. Peanut- and egg-responsive T cells were identified by CD154 upregulation after stimulation with the respective extract. Intracellular cytokines and chemokine receptors were also detected. The response to peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (Peanut Epicutaneous Phase II Immunotherapy Clinical Trial [CoFAR6]; 49 participants receiving epicutaneous immunotherapy) and egg oral immunotherapy or a baked egg diet (Baked Egg or Egg Oral Immunotherapy for Children With Egg Allergy [CoFAR7]; 92 participants) was monitored over time. Results: Peanut-specific type 2 and CCR6+ T cells were negatively correlated with each other and differently associated with immune parameters, including specific IgE level and basophil activation test result. At baseline, type 2 cells, but not CCR6+ cells, were predictive of clinical parameters, including a successfully consumed dose of peanut and baked egg tolerance. Exposure to peanut or egg immunotherapy was associated with a decrease in type 2 cell frequency. At baseline, high egg-specific type 2 cell frequency was the immune feature most predictive of oral immunotherapy failure. Conclusion: Food-specific type 2 T cells at baseline are informative of threshold of reactivity and response to immunotherapy.
AB - Background: Allergen-specific IL-4+ and IL-13+ CD4+ cells (type 2 cells) are essential for helping B cells to class-switch to IgE and establishing an allergic milieu in the gastrointestinal tract. The role of T cells in established food allergy is less clear. Objective: We examined the food allergen–specific T-cell response in participants of 2 food allergen immunotherapy trials to assess the relationship of the T-cell response to clinical phenotypes, including response to immunotherapy. Methods: Blood was obtained from 84 participants with peanut allergy and 142 participants with egg allergy who underwent double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges. Peanut- and egg-responsive T cells were identified by CD154 upregulation after stimulation with the respective extract. Intracellular cytokines and chemokine receptors were also detected. The response to peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (Peanut Epicutaneous Phase II Immunotherapy Clinical Trial [CoFAR6]; 49 participants receiving epicutaneous immunotherapy) and egg oral immunotherapy or a baked egg diet (Baked Egg or Egg Oral Immunotherapy for Children With Egg Allergy [CoFAR7]; 92 participants) was monitored over time. Results: Peanut-specific type 2 and CCR6+ T cells were negatively correlated with each other and differently associated with immune parameters, including specific IgE level and basophil activation test result. At baseline, type 2 cells, but not CCR6+ cells, were predictive of clinical parameters, including a successfully consumed dose of peanut and baked egg tolerance. Exposure to peanut or egg immunotherapy was associated with a decrease in type 2 cell frequency. At baseline, high egg-specific type 2 cell frequency was the immune feature most predictive of oral immunotherapy failure. Conclusion: Food-specific type 2 T cells at baseline are informative of threshold of reactivity and response to immunotherapy.
KW - T cells
KW - T2 cells
KW - basophil activation test
KW - double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge
KW - epicutaneous immunotherapy
KW - immunoglobulins
KW - oral immunotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119356210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.09.029
DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.09.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 34653515
AN - SCOPUS:85119356210
VL - 149
SP - 1373-1382.e12
JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
SN - 0091-6749
IS - 4
ER -