TY - JOUR
T1 - AI software detection of large vessel occlusion stroke on CT angiography
T2 - a real-world prospective diagnostic test accuracy study
AU - Matsoukas, Stavros
AU - Morey, Jacob
AU - Lock, Gregory
AU - Chada, Deeksha
AU - Shigematsu, Tomoyoshi
AU - Marayati, Naoum Fares
AU - Delman, Bradley N.
AU - Doshi, Amish
AU - Majidi, Shahram
AU - De Leacy, Reade
AU - Kellner, Christopher Paul
AU - Fifi, Johanna T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Background Artificial intelligence (AI) software is increasingly applied in stroke diagnostics. However, the actual performance of AI tools for identifying large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke in real time in a real-world setting has not been fully studied. Objective To determine the accuracy of AI software in a real-world, three-tiered multihospital stroke network. Methods All consecutive head and neck CT angiography (CTA) scans performed during stroke codes and run through an AI software engine (Viz LVO) between May 2019 and October 2020 were prospectively collected. CTA readings by radiologists served as the clinical reference standard test and Viz LVO output served as the index test. Accuracy metrics were calculated. Results Of a total of 1822 CTAs performed, 190 occlusions were identified; 142 of which were internal carotid artery terminus (ICA-T), middle cerebral artery M1, or M2 locations. Accuracy metrics were analyzed for two different groups: ICA-T and M1 ±M2. For the ICA-T/M1 versus the ICA-T/M1/M2 group, sensitivity was 93.8% vs 74.6%, specificity was 91.1% vs 91.1%, negative predictive value was 99.7% vs 97.6%, accuracy was 91.2% vs 89.8%, and area under the curve was 0.95 vs 0.86, respectively. Detection rates for ICA-T, M1, and M2 occlusions were 100%, 93%, and 49%, respectively. As expected, the algorithm offered better detection rates for proximal occlusions than for mid/ distal M2 occlusions (58% vs 28%, p=0.03). Conclusions These accuracy metrics support Viz LVO as a useful adjunct tool in stroke diagnostics. Fast and accurate diagnosis with high negative predictive value mitigates missing potentially salvageable patients.
AB - Background Artificial intelligence (AI) software is increasingly applied in stroke diagnostics. However, the actual performance of AI tools for identifying large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke in real time in a real-world setting has not been fully studied. Objective To determine the accuracy of AI software in a real-world, three-tiered multihospital stroke network. Methods All consecutive head and neck CT angiography (CTA) scans performed during stroke codes and run through an AI software engine (Viz LVO) between May 2019 and October 2020 were prospectively collected. CTA readings by radiologists served as the clinical reference standard test and Viz LVO output served as the index test. Accuracy metrics were calculated. Results Of a total of 1822 CTAs performed, 190 occlusions were identified; 142 of which were internal carotid artery terminus (ICA-T), middle cerebral artery M1, or M2 locations. Accuracy metrics were analyzed for two different groups: ICA-T and M1 ±M2. For the ICA-T/M1 versus the ICA-T/M1/M2 group, sensitivity was 93.8% vs 74.6%, specificity was 91.1% vs 91.1%, negative predictive value was 99.7% vs 97.6%, accuracy was 91.2% vs 89.8%, and area under the curve was 0.95 vs 0.86, respectively. Detection rates for ICA-T, M1, and M2 occlusions were 100%, 93%, and 49%, respectively. As expected, the algorithm offered better detection rates for proximal occlusions than for mid/ distal M2 occlusions (58% vs 28%, p=0.03). Conclusions These accuracy metrics support Viz LVO as a useful adjunct tool in stroke diagnostics. Fast and accurate diagnosis with high negative predictive value mitigates missing potentially salvageable patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138164161&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018391
DO - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018391
M3 - Article
C2 - 35086962
AN - SCOPUS:85138164161
SN - 1759-8478
VL - 15
SP - 52
EP - 56
JO - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
JF - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
IS - 1
ER -