Age-related changes in cortical bone toughness: Initiation vs. propagation

Ping Cheng Wu, Deepak Vashishth

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

A number of fracture mechanics studies have characterized bone's resistance to fracture in terms of critical stress intensity factor and critical strain energy release rate measured at the onset of a fracture crack. These studies, although useful, provide a limited insight into fracture behavior of bone as, unlike classical brittle materials, bone is a microcracking solid that derives its resistance to fracture during the process of crack propagation from microfracture mechanisms occurring behind the advancing crack front. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a propagation approach in identifying age-related changes in bone toughness. Initiation and propagation tests conducted on human cortical bone compact specimens demonstrated different magnitudes of age-related toughness loss in initiation and propagation. Compared to initiation, propagation toughness of cortical bone declined twice as rapidly and reached a near zero value at the 10th decade. These results clearly illustrate that age-related decrease in bone's fracture resistance may be more drastic than currently perceived and that the propagation-based measure may be more sensitive to age-related changes in bone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)425-426
Number of pages2
JournalAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings
Volume1
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the 2002 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 24th Annual Conference and the 2002 Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES / EMBS) - Houston, TX, United States
Duration: 23 Oct 200226 Oct 2002

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Crack propagation
  • Fracture toughness
  • Human bone

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Age-related changes in cortical bone toughness: Initiation vs. propagation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this