Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

Dean F. Bajorin, J. Alfred Witjes, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Michael Schenker, Begoña P. Valderrama, Yoshihiko Tomita, Aristotelis Bamias, Thierry Lebret, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Se Hoon Park, Dingwei Ye, Mads Agerbaek, Deborah Enting, Ray McDermott, Pablo Gajate, Avivit Peer, Matthew I. Milowsky, Alexander Nosov, João Neif Antonio, Krzysztof TupikowskiLaurence Toms, Bruce S. Fischer, Anila Qureshi, Sandra Collette, Keziban Unsal-Kacmaz, Edward Broughton, Dimitrios Zardavas, Henry B. Koon, Matthew D. Galsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

183 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant treatment in high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma after radical surgery is not clear. METHODS In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery to receive, in a 1:1 ratio, either nivolumab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks for up to 1 year. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before trial entry was allowed. The primary end points were disease-free survival among all the patients (intention-to-treat population) and among patients with a tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level of 1% or more. Survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract was a secondary end point. RESULTS A total of 353 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab and 356 to receive placebo. The median disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5 to 27.6) with nivolumab and 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 13.9) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and disease-free at 6 months was 74.9% with nivolumab and 60.3% with placebo (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.70; 98.22% CI, 0.55 to 0.90; P<0.001). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 74.5% and 55.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 98.72% CI, 0.35 to 0.85; P<0.001). The median survival free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract in the intention-to-treat population was 22.9 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 33.4) with nivolumab and 13.7 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 20.3) with placebo. The percentage of patients who were alive and free from recurrence outside the urothelial tract at 6 months was 77.0% with nivolumab and 62.7% with placebo (hazard ratio for recurrence outside the urothelial tract or death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89). Among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more, the percentage of patients was 75.3% and 56.7%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.79). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 17.9% of the nivolumab group and 7.2% of the placebo group. Two treatment-related deaths due to pneumonitis were noted in the nivolumab group. CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients with high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who had undergone radical surgery, disease-free survival was longer with adjuvant nivolumab than with placebo in the intention-to-treat population and among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 1% or more.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2102-2114
Number of pages13
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume384
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Jun 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this