Addressing the challenges of polygenic scores in human genetic research

John Novembre, Catherine Stein, Samira Asgari, Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui, Andrew Landstrom, Amy Lemke, Jun Li, Chloe Mighton, Matthew Taylor, Sarah Tishkoff

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

The genotyping of millions of human samples has made it possible to evaluate variants across the human genome for their possible association with risks for numerous diseases and other traits by using genome-wide association studies (GWASs). The associations between phenotype and genotype found in GWASs make possible the construction of polygenic scores (PGSs), which aim to predict a trait or disease outcome in an individual on the basis of their genotype (in the disease case, the term polygenic risk score [PRS] is often used). PGSs have shown promise for studying the biology of complex traits and as a tool for evaluating individual disease risks in clinical settings. Although the quantity and quality of data to compute PGSs are increasing, challenges remain in the technical aspects of developing PGSs and in the ethical and social issues that might arise from their use. This ASHG Guidance emphasizes three major themes for researchers working with or interested in the application of PGSs in their own research: (1) developing diverse research cohorts; (2) fostering robustness in the development, application, and interpretation of PGSs; and (3) improving the communication of PGS results and their implications to broad audiences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2095-2100
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Genetics
Volume109
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing the challenges of polygenic scores in human genetic research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this