TY - GEN
T1 - Active deep learning
T2 - 15th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI 2018
AU - Folmsbee, Jonathan
AU - Liu, Xulei
AU - Brandwein-Weber, Margaret
AU - Doyle, Scott
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/5/23
Y1 - 2018/5/23
N2 - Deep learning has yielded impressive performance on a variety of difficult machine learning tasks due to large, widely available annotated datasets. Unfortunately, acquiring such datasets is difficult in medical imaging. In particular, labels for computational pathology are tedious to create and require expert pathologists. In this work, we explore methods for efficiently training convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for tissue classification using Active Learning (AL) instead of the more common Random Learning (RL). Our dataset consists of 143 digitized images of hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole oral cavity cancer sections. We compare both AL and RL training in the task of using a CNN to identify seven tissue classes (stroma, lymphocytes, tumor, mucosa, keratin pearls, blood, and background / adipose). We find that the AL strategy provides an average 3.26% greater performance than RL for a given training set size.
AB - Deep learning has yielded impressive performance on a variety of difficult machine learning tasks due to large, widely available annotated datasets. Unfortunately, acquiring such datasets is difficult in medical imaging. In particular, labels for computational pathology are tedious to create and require expert pathologists. In this work, we explore methods for efficiently training convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for tissue classification using Active Learning (AL) instead of the more common Random Learning (RL). Our dataset consists of 143 digitized images of hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole oral cavity cancer sections. We compare both AL and RL training in the task of using a CNN to identify seven tissue classes (stroma, lymphocytes, tumor, mucosa, keratin pearls, blood, and background / adipose). We find that the AL strategy provides an average 3.26% greater performance than RL for a given training set size.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048080327&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363686
DO - 10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363686
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85048080327
T3 - Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging
SP - 770
EP - 773
BT - 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI 2018
PB - IEEE Computer Society
Y2 - 4 April 2018 through 7 April 2018
ER -