TY - JOUR
T1 - Acceptable performance of blood biomarker tests of amyloid pathology — recommendations from the Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer’s Disease
AU - Schindler, Suzanne E.
AU - Galasko, Douglas
AU - Pereira, Ana C.
AU - Rabinovici, Gil D.
AU - Salloway, Stephen
AU - Suárez-Calvet, Marc
AU - Khachaturian, Ara S.
AU - Mielke, Michelle M.
AU - Udeh-Momoh, Chi
AU - Weiss, Joan
AU - Batrla, Richard
AU - Bozeat, Sasha
AU - Dwyer, John R.
AU - Holzapfel, Drew
AU - Jones, Daryl Rhys
AU - Murray, James F.
AU - Partrick, Katherine A.
AU - Scholler, Emily
AU - Vradenburg, George
AU - Young, Dylan
AU - Algeciras-Schimnich, Alicia
AU - Aubrecht, Jiri
AU - Braunstein, Joel B.
AU - Hendrix, James
AU - Hu, Yan Helen
AU - Mattke, Soeren
AU - Monane, Mark
AU - Reilly, David
AU - Somers, Elizabeth
AU - Teunissen, Charlotte E.
AU - Shobin, Eli
AU - Vanderstichele, Hugo
AU - Weiner, Michael W.
AU - Wilson, David
AU - Hansson, Oskar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Limited 2024.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Anti-amyloid treatments for early symptomatic Alzheimer disease have recently become clinically available in some countries, which has greatly increased the need for biomarker confirmation of amyloid pathology. Blood biomarker (BBM) tests for amyloid pathology are more acceptable, accessible and scalable than amyloid PET or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests, but have highly variable levels of performance. The Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer’s Disease convened a BBM Workgroup to consider the minimum acceptable performance of BBM tests for clinical use. Amyloid PET status was identified as the reference standard. For use as a triaging test before subsequent confirmatory tests such as amyloid PET or CSF tests, the BBM Workgroup recommends that a BBM test has a sensitivity of ≥90% with a specificity of ≥85% in primary care and ≥75–85% in secondary care depending on the availability of follow-up testing. For use as a confirmatory test without follow-up tests, a BBM test should have performance equivalent to that of CSF tests — a sensitivity and specificity of ~90%. Importantly, the predictive values of all biomarker tests vary according to the pre-test probability of amyloid pathology and must be interpreted in the complete clinical context. Use of BBM tests that meet these performance standards could enable more people to receive an accurate and timely Alzheimer disease diagnosis and potentially benefit from new treatments.
AB - Anti-amyloid treatments for early symptomatic Alzheimer disease have recently become clinically available in some countries, which has greatly increased the need for biomarker confirmation of amyloid pathology. Blood biomarker (BBM) tests for amyloid pathology are more acceptable, accessible and scalable than amyloid PET or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests, but have highly variable levels of performance. The Global CEO Initiative on Alzheimer’s Disease convened a BBM Workgroup to consider the minimum acceptable performance of BBM tests for clinical use. Amyloid PET status was identified as the reference standard. For use as a triaging test before subsequent confirmatory tests such as amyloid PET or CSF tests, the BBM Workgroup recommends that a BBM test has a sensitivity of ≥90% with a specificity of ≥85% in primary care and ≥75–85% in secondary care depending on the availability of follow-up testing. For use as a confirmatory test without follow-up tests, a BBM test should have performance equivalent to that of CSF tests — a sensitivity and specificity of ~90%. Importantly, the predictive values of all biomarker tests vary according to the pre-test probability of amyloid pathology and must be interpreted in the complete clinical context. Use of BBM tests that meet these performance standards could enable more people to receive an accurate and timely Alzheimer disease diagnosis and potentially benefit from new treatments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196113848&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41582-024-00977-5
DO - 10.1038/s41582-024-00977-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 38866966
AN - SCOPUS:85196113848
SN - 1759-4758
VL - 20
SP - 426
EP - 439
JO - Nature Reviews Neurology
JF - Nature Reviews Neurology
IS - 7
ER -