ABX464 (obefazimod) for moderate-to-severe, active ulcerative colitis: a phase 2b, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled induction trial and 48 week, open-label extension

Severine Vermeire, Bruce E. Sands, Herbert Tilg, Zsolt Tulassay, Radoslaw Kempinski, Silvio Danese, Ivan Bunganič, Josianne Nitcheu, Julien Santo, Didier Scherrer, Sophie Biguenet, Hartmut J. Ehrlich, Jean Marc Steens, Paul Gineste, William J. Sandborn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: ABX464 (obefazimod) is a small molecule that selectively upregulates miR-124 in immune cells. We aimed to assess ABX464 as a treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe, active ulcerative colitis. Methods: In this phase 2b, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled induction trial, patients were recruited from 95 centres (hospitals and health-care centres) in 16 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18–75 years, with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe, active ulcerative colitis and a modified Mayo Score (MMS) of 5 points or higher, and a documented non-response or intolerance to previous treatment. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) via an interactive voice and web response system to receive once daily oral ABX464 100 mg, ABX464 50 mg, ABX464 25 mg, or matched placebo. Randomisation was stratified according to study site (US vs non-US) and to whether the patient had previous exposure to second-line treatment with biologics or JAK inhibitors. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in MMS at week 8. The primary efficacy analysis was done in the full analysis set (FAS), defined as all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had baseline data for at least one efficacy variable, and was analysed according to the principles of intention-to-treat. Safety analyses included patients who had been randomly assigned and who received at least one dose of study treatment. The 96 week open-label extension is ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04023396. Findings: Between Aug 13, 2019, and April 16, 2021, 254 patients were randomly allocated to ABX464 100 mg (n=64), ABX464 50 mg (n=63), ABX464 25 mg (n=63), or placebo (n=64). Two patients, both in the ABX464 25 mg group, were excluded from the FAS. In the FAS at week 8, the least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline in MMS was –2·9 (95% CI –3·4 to –2·5) for the ABX464 100 mg group, –3·2 (–3·7 to –2·7) for the ABX464 50 mg group, –3·1 (–3·6 to –2·6) for the ABX464 25 mg group, and –1·9 (–2·4 to –1·5) for placebo group; the magnitude of the difference in MMS from baseline was significantly greater in all three ABX464 groups compared with placebo (p=0·0039 for ABX464 100 mg vs placebo, p=0·0003 for ABX464 50 mg vs placebo, and p=0·0010 for ABX464 25 mg vs placebo). The most frequently reported adverse event was headache, which was reported for 27 (42%) of 64 patients in the ABX464 100 mg group, 19 (30%) of 63 in the 50 mg group, 13 (21%) of 62 in the 25 mg group, and five (8%) of 64 in the placebo group. Severe (grade 3) headache was reported for three (5%) patients in the ABX464 group 100 mg group, two (3%) in the ABX464 50 mg group, one (2%) in the ABX464 25 mg group, and none in the placebo group. The only serious adverse event reported for two or more patients in any group was ulcerative colitis (one in each of the ABX464 100 mg and 50 mg groups, and three [5%] in the placebo group). Interpretation: All doses of ABX464 significantly improved moderate-to-severe, active ulcerative colitis compared with placebo, as measured by changes in MMS from baseline to week 8. A phase 3 clinical programme is ongoing. Funding: Abivax.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1024-1035
Number of pages12
JournalThe Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume7
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ABX464 (obefazimod) for moderate-to-severe, active ulcerative colitis: a phase 2b, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled induction trial and 48 week, open-label extension'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this