A systematic review of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature, 1990-2005

Anthony D. LaMontagne, Tessa Keegel, Amber M. Louie, Aleck Ostry, Paul A. Landsbergis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

472 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ninety reports of systematic evaluations of job-stress interventions were rated in terms of the degree of systems approach used. A high rating was defined as both organizationally and individually focused, versus moderate (organizational only), and low (individual only). Studies using high-rated approaches represent a growing proportion of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature. Individual-focused, low-rated approaches are effective at the individual level, favorably affecting individual-level outcomes, but tend not to have favorable impacts at the organizational level. Organizationally- focused high- and moderate-rated approaches are beneficial at both individual and organizational levels. Further measures are needed to foster the dissemination and implementation of systems approaches to examining interventions for job stress.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)268-280
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Intervention
  • Job stress
  • Occupational stress
  • Systematic review
  • Work stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature, 1990-2005'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this