TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review of the impact of post-harvest aquatic food processing technology on gender equality and social justice
AU - Rao, Nitya
AU - Hooper, Lee
AU - Gray, Heather
AU - Grist, Natasha
AU - Forster, Johanna
AU - Bremner, Julie
AU - Sabir, Ghezal
AU - Heaton, Matthew
AU - Marwaha, Nisha
AU - Thakur, Sudarshan
AU - Wanyama, Abraham
AU - Zhang, Liangzi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Limited 2024.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Post-harvest practices and technologies are key to reducing global aquatic harvest loss. The lives of post-harvest fisheries workers, over half of them women, are deeply affected by these technologies, but their equity and equality outcomes are poorly understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence of post-harvest aquatic food processing technology outcomes, showing that persistent inequalities in social structure and norms disadvantage women across a range of technologies, both traditional and improved, especially regarding control over resources. We found that improved technologies bring enhanced productivity and possibly income for workers, yet contracts are often precarious due to pre-existing social inequities. While power and control of resources is more unequal in factory settings, it is not necessarily equal in traditional contexts either, despite offering greater flexibility. More rigorous comparative research, including voices of diverse actors, is key to understanding the impacts of different technologies on gender equality and social justice and inform policymaking.
AB - Post-harvest practices and technologies are key to reducing global aquatic harvest loss. The lives of post-harvest fisheries workers, over half of them women, are deeply affected by these technologies, but their equity and equality outcomes are poorly understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence of post-harvest aquatic food processing technology outcomes, showing that persistent inequalities in social structure and norms disadvantage women across a range of technologies, both traditional and improved, especially regarding control over resources. We found that improved technologies bring enhanced productivity and possibly income for workers, yet contracts are often precarious due to pre-existing social inequities. While power and control of resources is more unequal in factory settings, it is not necessarily equal in traditional contexts either, despite offering greater flexibility. More rigorous comparative research, including voices of diverse actors, is key to understanding the impacts of different technologies on gender equality and social justice and inform policymaking.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202148931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s43016-024-01034-6
DO - 10.1038/s43016-024-01034-6
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85202148931
SN - 2662-1355
VL - 5
SP - 731
EP - 741
JO - Nature Food
JF - Nature Food
IS - 9
ER -