A systematic review of the evidence for impaired cognitive theory of mind in maltreated children

Xavier Benarous, Jean Marc Guilé, Angèle Consoli, David Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Compared to the large number of studies exploring difficulties in emotion recognition in maltreated children, few (N = 12) have explored the cognitive aspect of theory of mind (ToM), i.e., the ability to understand others' thoughts and intentions. A systematic review of these studies shows inconsistent results regarding cognitive ToM tasks. Youths with a history of maltreatment are more likely to fail at false-belief tasks (N = 2). However, results are less conclusive regarding other tasks (perspective-taking tasks, N = 4; and hostile attribution tasks, N = 7). Additionally, only one study controlled for potential psychopathology. Measures of psychopathology and other cognitive abilities, in addition to ToM, are required to establish a specific association between maltreatment and the cognitive dimension of ToM.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108
JournalFrontiers in Psychiatry
Volume6
Issue numberJUL
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attribution biases
  • Child abuse
  • False-belief
  • Maltreatment
  • Perspective-taking
  • Social cognition
  • Systematic review
  • Theory of mind

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review of the evidence for impaired cognitive theory of mind in maltreated children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this