A systematic review of serious games in training: Health care professionals

Ryan Wang, Samuel DeMaria, Andrew Goldberg, Daniel Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

198 Scopus citations


Serious games are computer-based games designed for training purposes. They are poised to expand their role in medical education. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, aimed to synthesize current serious gaming trends in health care training, especially those pertaining to developmental methodologies and game evaluation. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried for relevant documents published through December 2014. Of the 3737 publications identified, 48 of them, covering 42 serious games, were included. From 2007 to 2014, they demonstrate a growth from 2 games and 2 genres to 42 games and 8 genres. Overall, study design was heterogeneous and methodological quality by MERQSI score averaged 10.5/18, which is modest. Seventy-nine percent of serious games were evaluated for training outcomes. As the number of serious games for health care training continues to grow, having schemas that organize how educators approach their development and evaluation is essential for their success.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-51
Number of pages11
JournalSimulation in Healthcare
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2016


  • Health care training
  • Medical education
  • Review
  • Serious game
  • Simulation


Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review of serious games in training: Health care professionals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this