A systematic review and meta-analysis on the epidemiology of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy

Jean K. Mah, Lawrence Korngut, Jonathan Dykeman, Lundy Day, Tamara Pringsheim, Nathalie Jette

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

295 Scopus citations


The muscular dystrophies are a broad group of hereditary muscle diseases with variable severity. Population-based prevalence estimates have been reported but pooled estimates are not available. We performed a systematic review of worldwide population-based studies reporting muscular dystrophies prevalence and/or incidence using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. The search strategy included key terms related to muscular dystrophies, incidence, prevalence and epidemiology. Two reviewers independently reviewed all abstracts, full text articles and abstracted data using standardized forms. Pooling of prevalence estimates was performed using random effect models. 1104 abstracts and 167 full text articles were reviewed. Thirty-one studies met all eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis. The studies differed widely in their approaches to case ascertainment, resulting in significant methodological heterogeneity and varied data quality. The pooled prevalence of DMD and BMD was 4.78 (95% CI 1.94-11.81) and 1.53 (95% CI 0.26-8.94) per 100,000 males respectively. The incidence of DMD ranged from 10.71 to 27.78 per 100,000. This is the first meta-analysis of worldwide prevalence estimates for muscular dystrophies. There is a need for more epidemiological studies addressing global estimates on incidence and prevalence of muscular dystrophies, utilizing standardized diagnostic criteria as well as multiple sources of case ascertainment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)482-491
Number of pages10
JournalNeuromuscular Disorders
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes


  • Epidemiology
  • Incidence
  • Muscular dystrophy
  • Population-based
  • Prevalence


Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review and meta-analysis on the epidemiology of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this